Some Real Talk About the Iran Deal
How Did ‘I’ll Fight the Jews’ Become a Selling Point For Democrats?
This Is America, FIFA
Wrong!
LA Does Not Love LA
Same S**t, Different Day
Pool Attacks Reflect the Left's Insanity
Your Castle, Their Plans: 21 Years After Kelo, the Government Still Holds the...
America Needs Fewer Performers and More Adults
No Ceasefire in the Islamic Republic’s War Against Women
Trump to Pardon 250 for 250: Will Paul Petersen, Imprisoned Victim of Lawfare,...
Colombia's Socialist Despot Blames Israel After Electoral Loss to Trump-Backed Candidate
More Than 20 Shot in Chicago Over Weekend As Trump Offers Help
This NYT Father's Day Article Will Make You Vomit
Sen. Gallego Under Fire for Using Campaign Cash on Super Bowl Tickets, Family...
Tipsheet

Ben Sasse Challenges Democrats' Histrionics on the Filibuster

Ben Sasse Challenges Democrats' Histrionics on the Filibuster
AP Photo/Patrick Semansky, Pool

Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) challenged Democrats’ hysterical rhetoric surrounding the legislative filibuster, as leadership of the majority caucus hopes to eliminate the 60-vote threshold. 

Advertisement

Democrats seek to abolish the procedural measure in order to advance major legislation, including the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and D.C. Statehood, with a simple majority. As it currently stands, the filibuster requires 60-votes to move forward with legislation, mandating an indication of consensus from both parties. 

In hopes of fast tracking President Biden’s agenda, Democrats now oppose the filibuster, despite using the measure in the past to torpedo GOP legislation. Sasse pointed out that Senate Democrats employed the filibuster just last year to sink Sen. Tim Scott’s (R-SC) police reform bill.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) does not currently have the votes to eliminate the filibuster. Sens. Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) remain opposed to altering Senate rules for political convenience. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) warned Democrats, as he has before, of the repercussions of eliminating important procedure.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement