Platner Is a Hilarious Symptom of Progressive Failure
Platner Is Out
You’re Just Going to Have to Kill Them or Walk Away From Iran,...
No Wonder Democrats Think Masculinity Is Toxic, Look at the Men They Elevate
Graham Platner Is Not Democrats' Only Problem
Jews Are Being Removed From Polite Society
What's the Real 'Defining Image of Race in America'?
A Few Unpopular Observations
What a 700-Year-Old Fresco Can Teach America
The Next Hurdle for Democratic Socialism Awaits in Michigan
Every Benefit Has a Constituency. The Bill Doesn't.
‘No Human Is Illegal’ Sounds Noble—Until You Examine What It Really Means
Reflections on the US Supreme Court
Maryland Man Gets 15 Years for Plotting to Join ISIS, Attack Jews in...
Massachusetts Man Indicted for Impersonating Army Veteran for Over 30 Years
Tipsheet

GOP Attorneys General Ask Supreme Court to Reverse Pennsylvania Court's Decision on Mail-in Ballots

GOP Attorneys General Ask Supreme Court to Reverse Pennsylvania Court's Decision on Mail-in Ballots
AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

A group of Republican Attorneys General filed an amicus brief on Monday in the court battle over Pennsylvania’s potential voter improprieties. 

Advertisement

The group of Attorneys General, from 10 different states, asks the Supreme Court of the United State to reverse the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s original ruling that allowed the state to accept ballots after polls had closed on election day, even without postmarks.

“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision overstepped its constitutional responsibility, encroached on the authority of the Pennsylvania legislature, and violated the plain language of the Election Clauses,” they write. “Worse still, the decision exacerbated the risk of mail-in ballot fraud by permitting mail-in ballots that are not postmarked or have no legible postmark to be received and counted several days after the election. The decision provided a window of time after Election Day, when the preliminary results were announced, in which unscrupulous actors could attempt to influence a close Presidential election in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.”

The power to regulate election procedure lies with the state legislatures, not the court, as the Attorneys General point out:

Advertisement

Related:

VOTER INTEGRITY

“As with other separation-of-powers provisions in the Constitution, the Election Clauses’ explicit allocation of authority to state legislatures to regulate federal elections is a structural check on governmental power that preserves liberty. Encroachment on this authority by another state actor undermines the specific design for separation of powers in the Constitution. The violation of separation of powers in this case threatens the liberty of all Americans, not just Pennsylvanians. And it diminishes one of their most precious liberties—the right to vote for President of the United States.”

The Trump campaign and the Pennsylvania Republican Party are continuing the fight in court, hoping that the Supreme Court will rule the mail-in ballots received after election day as illegitimate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement