The Democrats’ Malice and/or Stupidity Is Real, Not Staged
MAGA Is Dying? Look At What They Did to Anti-Redistricting Indiana Republicans Last...
Virginia Dems Are Officially Freaking Out That Their Gerrymandered Map Could Get Trashed
Was This Story From an ABC News Reporter Following Trump's Third Assassination Attempt...
DC Police Finally Hold Those Accountable for Cooking the Books on Crime Data
Here's Why Southwest Airlines Just Paid a Flight Attendant Nearly $1 Million
Colorado Democrats Kill Bill That Would Have Barred Probation for Certain Child Sex...
East Harlem Grocers Push Back on Mamdani's Commie Grocery Store Plan
They Hate You. Get Over It.
Victims of the Biden DOJ Lawfare Are Still Fighting
Kamala-Loving 'SNL' Rips 'Incompetent' Kash Patel
Mifepristone: Another Reason To Assert the Sanctity of Life
Trump and Congress Should Confront China on Genocide
Google’s 'Woke' Revolt Proves the Problem Was Never Fixed
Time Is Running Out
Tipsheet

GOP Attorneys General Ask Supreme Court to Reverse Pennsylvania Court's Decision on Mail-in Ballots

GOP Attorneys General Ask Supreme Court to Reverse Pennsylvania Court's Decision on Mail-in Ballots
AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

A group of Republican Attorneys General filed an amicus brief on Monday in the court battle over Pennsylvania’s potential voter improprieties. 

Advertisement

The group of Attorneys General, from 10 different states, asks the Supreme Court of the United State to reverse the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s original ruling that allowed the state to accept ballots after polls had closed on election day, even without postmarks.

“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision overstepped its constitutional responsibility, encroached on the authority of the Pennsylvania legislature, and violated the plain language of the Election Clauses,” they write. “Worse still, the decision exacerbated the risk of mail-in ballot fraud by permitting mail-in ballots that are not postmarked or have no legible postmark to be received and counted several days after the election. The decision provided a window of time after Election Day, when the preliminary results were announced, in which unscrupulous actors could attempt to influence a close Presidential election in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.”

The power to regulate election procedure lies with the state legislatures, not the court, as the Attorneys General point out:

Advertisement

Related:

VOTER INTEGRITY

“As with other separation-of-powers provisions in the Constitution, the Election Clauses’ explicit allocation of authority to state legislatures to regulate federal elections is a structural check on governmental power that preserves liberty. Encroachment on this authority by another state actor undermines the specific design for separation of powers in the Constitution. The violation of separation of powers in this case threatens the liberty of all Americans, not just Pennsylvanians. And it diminishes one of their most precious liberties—the right to vote for President of the United States.”

The Trump campaign and the Pennsylvania Republican Party are continuing the fight in court, hoping that the Supreme Court will rule the mail-in ballots received after election day as illegitimate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos