Trump Issues a New Order for Attorney General Pam Bondi. It's One That's...
Disney's Woke Snow White Is Getting Bombed Harder Than Gaza Right Now
CBS News Left Out a Crucial Detail in Their Shoddy Anti-Trump Piece About...
Tiananmen Timmy Is Racing to Walk Back These Remarks About Tesla
You Can’t Hate The Fake News Media Enough
The Gaslighting Is Not Working
About Those 100 'Faith Leaders' Who Support Reckless Government Spending
Globalist Debauchery
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 260: Interview with the Museum of the Bible’s...
Former Federal Prosecutor Under Trump, Biden Found Dead In Virginia Home
Trump Revokes Security Clearances for Joe Biden and Other Huge Names
Trump's DOE: A Course Correction in American Education is Exactly What We Need
Texas May Be Bringing Ibogaine Therapy to the U.S.
Oh Boy, Chuck Schumer Faces More Backlash
Trump WH Hits Back at Boston Mayor’s Bold Defiance
Tipsheet

GOP Attorneys General Ask Supreme Court to Reverse Pennsylvania Court's Decision on Mail-in Ballots

AP Photo/Timothy D. Easley

A group of Republican Attorneys General filed an amicus brief on Monday in the court battle over Pennsylvania’s potential voter improprieties. 

Advertisement

The group of Attorneys General, from 10 different states, asks the Supreme Court of the United State to reverse the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s original ruling that allowed the state to accept ballots after polls had closed on election day, even without postmarks.

“The Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision overstepped its constitutional responsibility, encroached on the authority of the Pennsylvania legislature, and violated the plain language of the Election Clauses,” they write. “Worse still, the decision exacerbated the risk of mail-in ballot fraud by permitting mail-in ballots that are not postmarked or have no legible postmark to be received and counted several days after the election. The decision provided a window of time after Election Day, when the preliminary results were announced, in which unscrupulous actors could attempt to influence a close Presidential election in Pennsylvania and elsewhere.”

The power to regulate election procedure lies with the state legislatures, not the court, as the Attorneys General point out:

Advertisement

“As with other separation-of-powers provisions in the Constitution, the Election Clauses’ explicit allocation of authority to state legislatures to regulate federal elections is a structural check on governmental power that preserves liberty. Encroachment on this authority by another state actor undermines the specific design for separation of powers in the Constitution. The violation of separation of powers in this case threatens the liberty of all Americans, not just Pennsylvanians. And it diminishes one of their most precious liberties—the right to vote for President of the United States.”

The Trump campaign and the Pennsylvania Republican Party are continuing the fight in court, hoping that the Supreme Court will rule the mail-in ballots received after election day as illegitimate.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement