Kamala Harris’ Reaction to the Now-Dead Hamas Ceasefire Deal Was Summed Up in...
Here's An IDF Officer Warning a Palestinian Civilian to Evacuate. The Call Is...
A Quick, Telling Little Internet Search
Proof of a Journalist Calling Politics Religion, and You Are Horrible for Laughing...
Sick Jews
Republicans Have a Chance to Fight Back Against Biden’s War on Small Business
The Right Sort of Nostalgia Makes Democracy Work Better
The Powerless Church
Jewish Students Are Facing Threats to Their Existence. Will We Stand By Them?
A Jewish Primer
The Hope and Hopelessness of Holocaust Memorial Day
As Jewish Heritage Month Begins, Let's Recognize Donald Trump's Achievements
Pro-Hamas Protests on College Campuses Are Getting Worse
Here's How Israel Plans to Take Rafah
Karine Jean-Pierre STILL Lacking in Responses on Pro-Hamas Protests
Tipsheet
Premium

Watch: Democrats Previously Argued the Importance of Nine Justices on the Bench

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats are going on the offensive against Republicans’ plans to confirm President Trump’s eventual nominee to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which he plans to announce on Saturday.

Just four years ago, when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declined to hold hearings for former President Obama’s final nominee for the high court, on account of divided government and an outgoing president, Democrats insisted that it was of utmost importance that the Senate confirm Garland in order to have nine justices on the bench:

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who is spearheading the Democrat-led charge against President Trump’s eventual nominee, accused Republicans of not doing their jobs in 2016 when McConnell was constitutionally justified in not holding hearings:

In regard to confirming a Supreme Court nominee, considering which parties control the White House and Senate, history is on the side of Republicans:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement