BLM Activists Issue Threats After Penny Verdict
Of Course the Associated Press Reported the Daniel Penny Verdict This Way
New Report Exposes Extensive Government Spying on Bank Accounts
Let the Voters Decide
We Have a Name: Suspect in Healthcare CEO Murder Case Identified
Why One Senator-Elect Will Be Sworn in Early
Lara Trump Is Stepping Down as RNC Co-Chair. Here's Why.
Here's How Daniel Penny Is Celebrating His Acquittal
Sick: Pro-Terrorism Lunatic Revealed Why He Shot Kindergarteners
Alvin Bragg Reacts to Daniel Penny's Acquittal
This Indigenous Group Voted to Ban 'Land Acknowledgement' Ceremonies
Daniel Penny's Fate Decided
Who Cares About Jordan Neely?
Is Trump Already Our De Facto President?
Kamala Harris Won’t Stop Talking About Abortion
Tipsheet
Premium

Watch: Democrats Previously Argued the Importance of Nine Justices on the Bench

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Democrats are going on the offensive against Republicans’ plans to confirm President Trump’s eventual nominee to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, which he plans to announce on Saturday.

Just four years ago, when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell declined to hold hearings for former President Obama’s final nominee for the high court, on account of divided government and an outgoing president, Democrats insisted that it was of utmost importance that the Senate confirm Garland in order to have nine justices on the bench:

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who is spearheading the Democrat-led charge against President Trump’s eventual nominee, accused Republicans of not doing their jobs in 2016 when McConnell was constitutionally justified in not holding hearings:

In regard to confirming a Supreme Court nominee, considering which parties control the White House and Senate, history is on the side of Republicans:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement