Biden Jets Out for One Last Vacation
Watch a Teacher's Letter Attacking Pro-Trump Family Members Blow Up in His Face
Look What These Israelis Used to Make Their Menorah for Hanukkah This Year
Libs Demand Congress Do Something That Was Considered an Act of Armed Rebellion...
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Law Barring Nonviolent Felons From Owning Firearms
British Transport Police Sued for Allowing Trans-Identified Males to Strip Search Women
Workers in This State Just Won the Right to Bring Their Guns to...
Here's What Has Jen Psaki Raking Democrats Over the Coals
Former Democratic Presidential Candidate Throws Hat in Ring for DNC Chair
Celebrating Media Mayhem with The Heckler Awards - Part 3: The Individual Categories
Why These Liberal Lawyers Think the Gov't Should Use 'Nuclear Option' to Prevent...
Trump Promises to Pursue Executions After Biden Commutes Most of Federal Death Row
Biden Orders Pentagon to Deliver More Weapons to Ukraine Just Weeks Before Leaving...
You Won't Believe What Happened at This Phoenix Airport on Christmas
Texas Woman Arrested and Charged After Authorities Made This Horrifying Discovery
Tipsheet

GOP Split on New 'Contract' Strategy

The GOP is banking on victory in November and putting their heads together in constructing a new "Contract for America" to guide the legislative priorities of a potential House majority.  According to Politico,
Advertisement
the party is split into two main camps:

House Minority Whip Eric Cantor wants a document, akin to Newt Gingrich’s 1994 Contract With America, that identifies specific pieces of legislation Republicans could pass if they win back the House. He thinks Republicans should “put up or shut up,” an aide close to the process said. 

So does Indiana Rep. Mike Pence, the House Republican Conference chairman. The party doesn’t need “sloganeering,” someone familiar with his thinking said, and he favors an approach that “tells people what [the party] want[s] and how you’re going to do it.” 

But Rep. Kevin McCarthy, the California Republican who is leading the effort to craft the document, says that including specific legislation in the contract would smack of the backroom deals the GOP accuses Democrats of making, so “you won’t see it written out.” 

Obviously each plan has its merits, but I would cation the party from spelling out many particular items like the first Contract did.  We have to remember that during the Gingrich revolution of the 90s, we were dealing with President Clinton--obviously liberal, but someone who seems quite moderate in comparison to Barack Obama.

Advertisement

The GOP needs to speak more in generalities this time around.  This is not to say the party shouldn't be held to high standards when it come to delivering, but I'd hate the GOP to put itself in a position where they either have to compromise on principles to pass a measure with Obama's approval, or accomplish nothing and open the conservative movement up to attacks from the Left that claim we were unable to accomplish any of the things we set out to. 

Perhaps the GOP's new 'Contract with America' ought to stick to reaffirming conservative governing principles.  Leave the accountability and achievement quantifiers and judgments to the voters.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement