Some Republicans Know How to Win
The OPEC Cartel Crackup
Zyn Isn't Sin
Jake Tapper Wants to Shield Jokes From Criticism...Unless He Is the One Dictating...
Educated to Death
Charlie Kirk Changed My College Decision
The Media Could Attempt a 'Nonpartisan Bias'
How to Think About Affordability
Your Whereabouts Are Known at All Times
Two Nations With Shared Values
Clarence Thomas Sounds the Alarm: Progressivism’s Direct Assault on the Declaration of Ind...
Finland Study Shows 'Gender Affirming Care' Is Losing the Science. Children’s Hospitals Be...
Is SCOTUS Ducking Transgender School Cases?
You Will Own Nothing
Marco Rubio Is Standing Up to China Over This Major Trade Partner
Tipsheet

We Know How Fake Citations Ended Up in the Paperwork of an Appeal Before the GA Supreme Court

We Know How Fake Citations Ended Up in the Paperwork of an Appeal Before the GA Supreme Court
AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File

Yes, this was a brutal story: a lawyer was asked by a state supreme court judge how fake citations and statutes made their way into the paperwork of an appeals case. The Georgia Supreme Court has an appeal for Hannah Payne before it. She’s a woman who shot and killed Kenneth Herring in 2019 in Clayton County following a vehicular incident. The district attorney’s office submitted its paperwork with a fake citation in it. They had until April 2 to explain, and as many suspected, it was due to the use of AI (via Fox5Atlanta): 

Advertisement

The Clayton County District Attorney has apologized to the Supreme Court of Georgia, after a prosecutor admitted to relying on artificial intelligence to write court briefings, which contained made-up legal citations.

"In my almost 30-year career as an attorney and 17 years as an elected official, I never imagined a situation where I would do what I am doing now," wrote DA Tasha Mosley, in a letter obtained by FOX 5's Rob DiRienzo. 

Supreme Court of Georgia Chief Justice Nels Peterson said one of Mosley's prosecutors, Deborah Leslie, filed an argument with at least five citations to cases that don't exist, and at least five more citations to cases that do not support the proposition for which they're cited. 

Leslie, who initially claimed the filing was altered, later admitted to using AI. 

[…] 

It's just the latest example of attorneys relying too much on artificial intelligence, and getting caught red-handed.  

"We've seen judges reprimand them," said Tom Church, a metro Atlanta trial attorney. "We haven't seen it on this kind of platform, you know, with the Supreme Court, and we haven't seen it from a prosecutor." 

Church says the use of AI in high-level legal proceedings carries significant professional responsibility.

Advertisement

You think, man? 

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement