Skynet Panic or Power Grab? Bipartisan Bill Would Let Government Shut Down AI...
Appeals Court Rejects Trump Administration's Efforts to Re-Detain Researcher Over Israel C...
Ted Cruz Makes Interesting Prediction About Democrats in 2028
‘You’ve Got Mail’: NYC Mayor Taunts Wealthy Homeowners As He Robs Them Blind...
Cory Mills Lashes Out at Claims That the DOJ Is Investigating Him
Long Island Residents Object to All-Boys Muslim Boarding School in Their Neighborhood
Freddy, Everyone's Favorite German Tourist, Bids America Farewell
The DNC Has Chosen Which State Will Be the First on the 2028...
This Is Who Mamdani Blamed for NYPD Violence
USA Today Stands by Nancy Armour's Ridiculous Caitlin Clark Column
Here's Why the NYPD Union Is Livid With Mamdani Right Now
Gavin Newsom Just Announced He's Going to Waste More Taxpayer Money on Fighting...
James Talarico Jumps on the 'Prison Is Violence' Bandwagon, and That'll Go Over...
Look, If James Carville Says So…
Exclusive: ICE's Latest Arrests Include Serious Criminals As Daily Numbers Remain High
Tipsheet

MSNBC Is Melting Down Over the Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Ruling

MSNBC Is Melting Down Over the Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Ruling
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

There’s going to be more somber commentaries of this nature today, but MSNBC is going through it right now. The Supreme Court has clipped the power of rogue, undemocratic judges to issue national injunctions in the manner they have concerning the Trump administration. It was tantamount to a judicial coup. The CASA decision, which ultimately reined in these judges, sought to address Trump's order regarding birthright citizenship. The Court didn’t tackle the issue of birthright citizenship outright, but district courts abusing nationwide injunctions is over (via SCOTUSblog): 

Advertisement

Because universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts, the court grants the government’s applications for a partial stay of the injunctions entered below regarding the implementation and enforcement of the Trump administration’s Jan. 20 executive order ending birthright citizenship, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue.

The liberal network’s legal correspondents craft hypotheticals to elicit the usual response from their audience. They were dismayed that this power to block policy has been rendered ineffective in this manner.  

Advertisement

“You have [The courts] acting like a rogue bystander to the serious deprivation of what we've long assumed for 128 years is a fundamental constitutional right,” said Lisa Rubin. 

It was never meant to be applied in this manner, that is, a president intentionally allowing our country to be invaded by 11-plus million illegals, like Joe Biden did. Our Founders likely never thought we’d see a president that insane, who would willingly allow our borders to be violated in such a manner to increase the population and political clout of his party via census and congressional apportionment. That’s why Democrats are opposed to any immigration enforcement measures. If that’s how they’re going to game the system, then, yes, tweaks to birthright citizenship must be taken.  

Advertisement

We'll keep you posted. I'm sure CNN will be screaming in a glass case of emotion later. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement