Why Women Support Donald Trump
Here Are the Changes Secret Service Has Made Since Trump Was Shot
Arizona AG Investigating Trump's Liz Cheney Remarks Because Everyone Is Doing Bath Salts
What Caused a Conservative Radio Host to Rip off the Headset During a...
The Press Pimps a Firing Squad Lie, and The NY Times YouTube Hit-Piece...
RNC Demands Investigation Into Alleged Fraudulent Voter Registration Scheme
Apparently There's Evidence of Ballot Harvesting in This Swing State
Supreme Court Rules PA Allowed to Count Back-Up Votes If Mail-In Ballots Are...
Uh Oh, These States Are Already Having Voting Issues
DC Prepares for Riots, Violence on Election Day
Did Jimmy Kimmel Just Commit 'Election Interference?'
Tim Walz's Insults for Elon Musk Are Getting Weirder and Weirder
Here's What the Most Accurate Poll for 2020 Is Saying About the Key...
Here's Why This Transgender Woman Sued This Restaurant Chain
House Republicans Demand Answers on IRS Whistleblower Retaliation
Tipsheet

Nikki Haley Decides to Jettison the One Thing That's Kept Her Alive in This Race

AP Photo/Abbie Parr

You had to do a double-take last night when Nikki Haley took the podium to address her supporters after finishing a dismal third in Iowa. Pollster Ann Selzer had the former South Carolina governor surging but noted the abysmal voter enthusiasm surrounding Nimrata. So, why would someone who finished third say something like this: “I can safely say tonight, Iowa made the Republican primary a two-person race.”

Advertisement

Leah wrote about Haley trying to clarify her remarks today

“First of all, look at where we started: I mean, when we started, there were 14 people in the race. We had 2 percent in the polls and we came out with a strong showing,” she replied.

“That’s what we wanted in Iowa, now we’re in New Hampshire,” Haley continued. “You can look at the polls in New Hampshire—we’re a stone’s throw away from Donald Trump and so we’re going to continue to work really hard. We’ve been here for 11 months, we’ve done over 75 town halls…we know that that gave us the strength coming out of Iowa, we’re going to get even stronger in New Hampshire going to South Carolina.” 

This woman loves to clarify, probably because she needs to gauge where the political winds are blowing. She wanted to ban some activity on social media, specifically the creation of anonymous accounts, which would be weeded out with verification technology, most likely biometric data, which the tech companies would’ve loved. Even from her supporters, the reaction to this creepy Orwellian public policy pitch led to her walking it back. 

She didn’t clarify her Iowa remarks; she stuck to the script and still looked like an idiot. Lady, when you finish third and say it’s a two-person race, you’re talking about the other people. Does Nikki need a drug test?   

Advertisement

But let’s be nice to Nikki for a second—maybe she was referring to the upcoming New Hampshire primary next Tuesday, where some polls show her within striking distance of Trump. Then again, pollsters showed her surging in Iowa and came in third. Her campaign’s memo about New Hampshire being less Trump-friendly is also not correct: Trump won New Hampshire in 2016. If one thing has remained constant, the former president remains popular with the base. Also, let’s not kid ourselves: if Trump is the nominee, most DeSantis and Haley supporters will follow suit. Let’s cut the crap about primary divisions. The 2016 GOP field was splintered to hell, and everyone came together for the general. The same goes for Mitt Romney, who was not the Tea Party’s favorite candidate, but the base united in 2012. I can’t say the same thing for Trump’s folks. If the former president fails to re-clinch the nomination, they’ll likely sit 2024 out. Luckily, that’s not going to happen.

Advertisement

In the meantime, even left-leaning publications, like Politico, are mocking Haley’s remarks, saying she’s trying to will a two-person race into existence. Her first step is to decline all debates until Trump joins [emphasis mine]: 

Of course, New Hampshire may provide a less hospitable electorate for Trump. But his allies are planning to go all out against Haley in the final week before the first-in-the-nation primary, NBC’s Natasha Korecki, Matt Dixon and Jane Timm report. It’ll be “a level of vitriol … that she hasn’t yet seen,” though Haley plans to step up her Trump criticisms, too. 

[…] 

Perhaps counterintuitively, Haley — who has benefited like no other candidate from the primary debates this cycle — announced this morning that she’ll refuse to participate in any more without Trump or President JOE BIDEN on the stage, per Kierra Frazier. “We’ve had five great debates in this campaign. Unfortunately, Donald Trump has ducked all of them,” she said in a statement. “He has nowhere left to hide.” 

Haley’s surprise move a day after finishing third in Iowa threatens to torpedo two planned Granite State debates, from ABC News/WMUR-TV on Thursday and CNN on Sunday. Florida Gov. RON DeSANTIS lashed out on X, calling Haley “afraid” to debate him and saying he would “honor my commitments.” 

But it’s not clear where the TV networks can go from here. An ABC News spokesperson said they’ve given Trump and Haley a formal deadline of 5 p.m. today to commit to Thursday’s debate. 

Advertisement

If she doesn’t show up, maybe DeSantis should use those entire blocks to pitch and punch at will. 

UPDATE: Thursday's debate has been canceled.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement