When the Law Is Optional, You Have Tyranny
The Olympics Have Ended. We Should End Sports ‘Journalism,’ Too.
It's Time for Another Episode of Scott Jennings Shredding Liberal Narratives on CNN
Did Donald Trump Call Into C-SPAN's Washington Journal? Here's What Happened.
Tucker Carlson's Sleight of Hand
Democrats Are Already Dumping on Newsom
The Great Replacement Is Worse Than You Imagined
Jesse Jackson’s Real Legacy
The Poison of Marxist Leftism
You Should Be Terrorized by What JPMorgan Did to Trump
The Party of Hate Is Unleashing Political Violence
San Fernando Valley Film Accountant Pleads Guilty to $2 Million Embezzlement Scheme
Gavin Newsom, Bernie Sanders Say They Don't Know How to Get Birth Certificates
Romanian Hacker Pleads Guilty in 2021 Breach of Oregon State Government Office
Chaos Erupts in Mexico After Elimination of Cartel Leader 'El Mencho'
Tipsheet

Dem Candidate: It's Tough to Define What a Woman Is

Dem Candidate: It's Tough to Define What a Woman Is

Nothing Democrats do right now is simple, and the stuff they do semi-well looks like a tire fire. They deal with a party leader with atrocious approval ratings, an economic recession, high inflation, and an out-of-control border crisis. The spike in crime has also resonated in suburban areas, which is why Dr. Mehmet Oz, the Republican Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, has chipped away at the double-digit lead of his Democratic opponent, Lt. Gov. John Fetterman. This question about defining women is an easy layup. It couldn’t get more straightforward than this on a debate stage. Forget layup—this is a slam-dunk. And yet, the Democrats trip over their tongues over political correctness constraints. In the race between Iowa Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson and Democrat Liz Mathis, this subject of discussion was brought up at a Rotary Club event in Waterloo, Iowa—and Mathis offered a weird response (via Fox News):

Advertisement

 Liz Mathis, a Democrat who is seeking to represent the Iowa's 2nd Congressional District, said this week that defining a woman is a "tough question" and suggested that the only way to change controversial policies in a particular school district in the state is to vote for different board members.

 The remarks from Mathis came Monday during a meet and greet at the Waterloo, Iowa, Rotary Club, where she took questions from those in attendance on a number of subjects, including gender and education.

 Asked about the instance when then Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson was asked to define a woman and could not because she is "not a biologist," Mathis said: "The Supreme Court confirmation process is very thorough, so they had to ask questions like that to a Supreme Court justice."

 "I'm glad that she answered that question," she added. "That's a tough question."

Mathis responded that defining what a woman is could be a tricky question. Has the Left devolved intellectually on this topic? Or are they just worried that the woke mob might mobilize since Mathis saying the obvious on the subject might offend the one or two transgender people within 550 miles of this candidate meet-and-greet event?

 We’re seeing this nationwide, liberals who deny the existence of womanhood, which is just abject science denialism, and claim that men can get pregnant. To deny that is a heinous affront to these people’s identities akin to violence.

Advertisement

Related:

2022 ELECTIONS

 I’m not going to complain, but liberals are playing a dangerous game here regarding abortion because only one gender can get pregnant. The Left could eat itself before the talking points are ever disseminated, thanks to their acceptance of woke leftism.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement