Oh, So That's What Hamas Did on the Eve of the Ceasefire Deal...
Here Are the Six Ringleaders of the Biden Mental Health Cover-Up
Here's What an Immigration Activist Said This Week That Set Josh Hawley Off
CNN's Scott Jennings Was Left Speechless By the Insanity of This Ex-Kamala Staffer
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 251: What the Old Testament Says About Leadership
Illegal Aliens Flee U.S. Voluntarily with Less Than 24 Hours Before Trump’s Inauguration
Greenland PM Has Strong Message for Trump Amid Potential Buy
Virginia's Glenn Youngkin Provides an Assist for Inauguration
Social Media Has a Field Day As Joe Biden's Belongings Seen Being Moved...
First Images of Freed Hostages Released
Watch the Cringe-Worthy Moment That Has Everyone Talking About AG Merrick Garland
The Trump Family Officially Arrives In DC
AZ Public Schools Drown in Financial Scandals, and All the Democrats Care About...
Why the Education Department’s Actions Against Christian Schools and Career Colleges Deman...
Iranian Mullahs About to Face a Trump Tornado
Tipsheet

NASA: Key Antarctic Glacier Not Melting As Rapidly

Al Gore thinks the weather has been out of the Book of Revelation, while Time and ABC News have reported that Antarctica is melting very quickly. Now, it’s not (via NASA):

Advertisement
The melt rate of West Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is an important concern, because this glacier alone is currently responsible for about 1 percent of global sea level rise. A new NASA study finds that Thwaites' ice loss will continue, but not quite as rapidly as previous studies have estimated.
The new study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, finds that numerical models used in previous studies have overestimated how rapidly ocean water is able to melt the glacier from below, leading them to overestimate the glacier's total ice loss over the next 50 years by about 7 percent.

Despite what liberals may say about global warming, science is never a settled issue. That’s what you should glean from this. The studies can be wrong. The models can be wrong. And the question nations face concerning so-called global warming is whether they wan to invest hundreds of billion, if not trillions, of dollars on a group of people who have been wrong before. How much economic growth, decreased standard of living, less prosperity, and the accompanying misery will you artificially inflict among those in your society on predictions that have been grossly inaccurate? In the 1970s, global cooling was the threat that could spell mankind’s doom. Nothing ever happened.

Advertisement

Peter Gwynne has gone back and updated his 1975 Newsweek piece to deny climate change skeptics of using is as ammunition. Still, he had to change it because the science was wrong—and Gwynne admits that. He said that this field of study is always advancing. Yet, if you speak to these green warriors, the issue is settled. There is no more debate. 

I beg to differ.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement