There's About to Be Some Prime GOP Betrayal on the SAVE Act
Jerry O'Connell Admitted Something to Bill Maher..and the HBO Host Couldn't Tolerate It
So, Based on These Remarks, Graham Platner Knew This Was a Nazi Tattoo,...
Sen. Cornyn's Airport Lunch Stop Turns to Chaos After Democrat Lawmaker Ambushes Him
Washington Democrats Introduce Bill to Crack Down on Political Speech Rights for Corporati...
While Democrats Keep DHS Shut Down, We're Learning the Michigan Terrorist Had More...
The U.K. Is About to Pull the Plug on Assisted Suicide Legislation
TIME Suddenly Cares About What We're Spending on Operation Epic Fury
It Looks Like Zohran Mamdani's Been Caught in a Pretty Significant Lie
It Looks Like the Israel Defense Force Just Eliminated the Basij Commander
Read Fairfax County School Board's Lame Statement on Illegal Alien Accused of Groping...
It Turns Out Zohran Mamdani Is a Just Another Autocratic Socialist
Gavin Newsom's Press Office Just Attacked Nick Shirley for Exposing California Fraud
Christ Before Me: The Courage to Return
Two Senior Iranian Officials Killed in Overnight Airstrike by Israeli Forces
Tipsheet

NASA: Key Antarctic Glacier Not Melting As Rapidly

NASA: Key Antarctic Glacier Not Melting As Rapidly

Al Gore thinks the weather has been out of the Book of Revelation, while Time and ABC News have reported that Antarctica is melting very quickly. Now, it’s not (via NASA):

Advertisement
The melt rate of West Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is an important concern, because this glacier alone is currently responsible for about 1 percent of global sea level rise. A new NASA study finds that Thwaites' ice loss will continue, but not quite as rapidly as previous studies have estimated.
The new study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, finds that numerical models used in previous studies have overestimated how rapidly ocean water is able to melt the glacier from below, leading them to overestimate the glacier's total ice loss over the next 50 years by about 7 percent.

Despite what liberals may say about global warming, science is never a settled issue. That’s what you should glean from this. The studies can be wrong. The models can be wrong. And the question nations face concerning so-called global warming is whether they wan to invest hundreds of billion, if not trillions, of dollars on a group of people who have been wrong before. How much economic growth, decreased standard of living, less prosperity, and the accompanying misery will you artificially inflict among those in your society on predictions that have been grossly inaccurate? In the 1970s, global cooling was the threat that could spell mankind’s doom. Nothing ever happened.

Advertisement

Peter Gwynne has gone back and updated his 1975 Newsweek piece to deny climate change skeptics of using is as ammunition. Still, he had to change it because the science was wrong—and Gwynne admits that. He said that this field of study is always advancing. Yet, if you speak to these green warriors, the issue is settled. There is no more debate. 

I beg to differ.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement