How About a Dignity Act for Actual Americans?
Congress Is Gearing Up for Their Version of the Purge. Here's Who's on...
Why Everyone Tracking Oil Tanker Traffic Is Pleased to See Where They're Heading
The Inevitable Has Happened for Eric Swalwell
The Locust Left Shows You Who Not to Vote for: A Handy Guide
'Parents Need to Be Aware': High-Profile Transgender Cases Shaping America's Battle Over P...
NATO: No Action, Talk Only
My Generation Cannot Sustain the America Democrats Are Creating
The Insulting DIGNITY Act
Trust Iran? Why?
Critical Race Theory: On the Ropes but Lingering
Goodbye NATO, Hello America First
Funded Silence: Congress Shields Itself While Lecturing Everyone Else
Man Accused of Smuggling 655 Illegal Aliens Sentenced to 8 Years
This New Poll on Iran Is Eye-Opening
Tipsheet

NASA: Key Antarctic Glacier Not Melting As Rapidly

NASA: Key Antarctic Glacier Not Melting As Rapidly

Al Gore thinks the weather has been out of the Book of Revelation, while Time and ABC News have reported that Antarctica is melting very quickly. Now, it’s not (via NASA):

Advertisement
The melt rate of West Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier is an important concern, because this glacier alone is currently responsible for about 1 percent of global sea level rise. A new NASA study finds that Thwaites' ice loss will continue, but not quite as rapidly as previous studies have estimated.
The new study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, finds that numerical models used in previous studies have overestimated how rapidly ocean water is able to melt the glacier from below, leading them to overestimate the glacier's total ice loss over the next 50 years by about 7 percent.

Despite what liberals may say about global warming, science is never a settled issue. That’s what you should glean from this. The studies can be wrong. The models can be wrong. And the question nations face concerning so-called global warming is whether they wan to invest hundreds of billion, if not trillions, of dollars on a group of people who have been wrong before. How much economic growth, decreased standard of living, less prosperity, and the accompanying misery will you artificially inflict among those in your society on predictions that have been grossly inaccurate? In the 1970s, global cooling was the threat that could spell mankind’s doom. Nothing ever happened.

Advertisement

Peter Gwynne has gone back and updated his 1975 Newsweek piece to deny climate change skeptics of using is as ammunition. Still, he had to change it because the science was wrong—and Gwynne admits that. He said that this field of study is always advancing. Yet, if you speak to these green warriors, the issue is settled. There is no more debate. 

I beg to differ.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement