Florida Dem Who Suffered a Meltdown When New Maps Were Passed Has Been...
Former Mumford and Sons Member Was Not Happy With What This Guest Said...
Law Professor Calls Out Democrat Lawyer for His Insane Take on the VA...
Fetterman: Democratic Base Is Becoming Increasingly Anti-American
A Woman Noticed a Red Spot on Her Tongue. It Almost Killed Her
You'll Never Guess What the Anti-Gunners are Trying to Ban Now
Gavin Newsom Is Lying About California's 'Balanced' Budget
After Failing to Pass a Radical Gun Control Bill, a Minnesota Democrat Responded...
Yale Faculty Report Admits Higher Ed Trust Crisis Self-Inflicted
A Silver Lining to Leftist Street Violence
Anti-Police Remarks From This Arizona Democrat Resurface During National Police Week
Is This Anti-Trump Republican Now Hiding His Payments to His Democrat Consultant?
Great Nations Aren't Destroyed by Enemies. They're Destroyed by Debt.
The Electoral College and American Freedom
The United Arab Emirates Is Playing Its Own Game
Tipsheet

New York Senator: I'm Voting Against Waiver That Would Allow Marine Corps General To Serve As Defense Secretary

New York Senator: I'm Voting Against Waiver That Would Allow Marine Corps General To Serve As Defense Secretary

Well, we already have our first lawmaker who plans to oppose President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for secretary of defense. Trump picked former Marine Corps General James Mattis to head the Pentagon, but there’s a catch. Congress needs to pass a waiver for Mattis since the law states that those who had served in uniform must be retired for at least seven years before being allowed to serve as defense secretary. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has already said she will vote against the waiver out of respect for civilian control on the military (via Politico):

Advertisement

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) on Thursday said she plans to vote against the waiver required for retired Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis to serve as Donald Trump’s defense secretary.

Gillibrand’s early opposition to the waiver came less than an hour after Trump announced he would tap Mattis for the Pentagon. The popular commander, nicknamed "Mad Dog," is still expected to become the first defense secretary nominee in more than 60 years to win the congressional waiver that's necessary to install him as the military's civilian leader given his recent service in uniform.

“While I deeply respect General Mattis’s service, I will oppose a waiver," Gillibrand said in a statement. "Civilian control of our military is a fundamental principle of American democracy, and I will not vote for an exception to this rule.”

Yeah, and if Clinton had won the election and picked Mattis for secretary of defense, which is possible, you think Gillibrand would vote against the waiver too? I think not.

“Civilian control of our military is a fundamental principle of American democracy.” Yeah—no kidding; do you think Mattis is going to storm Capitol Hill with tanks and troops should he be confirmed? I guarantee it’s not going to be Darth Vader and his storm troopers taking over the country should he have the opportunity to lead the Pentagon, which I think he will. Moreover, it’s happened before when President Harry Truman picked George Marshall to be secretary of defense. Like Trump’s win in November, we all survived. For progressives and Democrats, Gillibrand is standing on principle. For others, she’s dying on the wrong hill and just being difficult as the fledgling Trump administration take form. This isn’t unprecedented. It’s another tantrum.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement