Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
The Cleveland Cavaliers Couldn't Admit This Simple Fact After Getting Crushed by the...
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
Pollsters Are Underestimating Trump 10 Years Later. What Might It Mean for the...
The Push by Democrats to Ban One of the Commonly Owned Handguns in...
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Germany's Bureaucracy Crisis: How Red Tape Is Costing the Economy €146 Billion a...
The Real AI Risk Isn’t Regulation. It’s Strategic Blindness.
America Is Sleepwalking Toward Q-Day While Cybercriminals Prepare for the Future
Putin’s Efforts to Subvert Armenia’s Elections Can Harm US Interests
The Deal to Keep the Islamic Republic Alive
US-UAE Relations: Dubai Remains a Pillar of Stability in the Middle East
Tipsheet

State Department: FBI Is Wrong; We're Not Lax On Protecting Classified Information

State Department: FBI Is Wrong; We're Not Lax On Protecting Classified Information

State Department Spokesman John Kirby was not happy about FBI Director James Comey’s assessment of the culture at federal agency regarding handling classified information. Comey said that there were egregious lapses in security protocols regarding how Clinton and her team disseminated such information.

Advertisement

“While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government,” said Comey.

Yet, he added that they were not recommending that charges be brought forward against her. Nevertheless, it was this passage that Kirby took umbrage with, noting that the use of Clinton’s servers were taken “very seriously,” and that they didn’t have “lax security” at State concerning safe guarding sensitive information.

Of course, Kirby was under siege by the press, who relentlessly pressed him on the various aspects of Comey’s briefing that pointed to various emails that contained classified information at the time that these communications were sent or received.

“We will not discuss individual security clearances. We won't speak to FBI findings or the investigation. State Department does not take lightly the safety of classified information. We don't share the assessment that the State Department is lax on classified information,” said Kirby.

Advertisement

Repeatedly, Kirby deflected for further information on this announcement this morning, directing those inquiries to the FBI, while adding that the State Department doesn’t share their “broad assessment.” Yet, he did clarify that the State Department isn’t perfect, and that their own Inspector General report noted some lapses in protocol regarding classified information; they’re just not happy (again) with how Comey pretty much said that they didn’t know what they were doing.

Kirby noted that he could say he can disagree with the FBI’s assessment due to the training one undertakes to be employed at State, the periodic reviews of the training in handling sensitive information, and the fact that he had to go through it several times himself.

Yet, when asked again about the remarks, Kirby evaded.

This post will be updated.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos