We Don't Want to Lose
'It Was a Setup': Why the SC GOP Nuked the Redistricting Effort
Ilhan Omar Responds to Nancy Mace's Bill Banning Foreigners From Holding Office
NJ Governor Complains After ICE Stops Her From Entering ICE Facility
Michigan Dem Mallory McMorrow Doubles Down on Defending Gender Mutilation of Children
Bishop Barron Blasts Catholic Leftists for Opposing Immigration Enforcement
Parents Want to Bar Graham Platner From Schools
Tom Steyer Vows to Make Women Second Class Citizens When He's Governor of...
Are Wisconsin Democrats Trying to Torpedo Francesca Hong's Gubernatorial Run?
Lefties No Longer Trying to Hide How They Want You Disarmed
Zohran Mamdani Just Announced Plans to Begin Seizing and Redistributing Private Property
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Says We Can't Just Arrest Our Way to Public...
Zohran Mamdani Took a Swing at Margaret Thatcher. Now It's Coming Back to...
Major University Faces Trump Admin Lawsuit: 'Hostile Educational Environment'
Trump Chooses Symbolic Location for Next Cabinet Meeting
Tipsheet

Instrument of Hope, Or Political Hack?

Instrument of Hope, Or Political Hack?
Photobucket

If you haven't seen it yet, this is the new cover of Rolling Stone Magazine.

The cover story is called, "Machinery of Hope" -- which is exactly how Obama wants to portray himself.
Advertisement


By the way, I agree with David Brooks' column today where he argues Barack Obama cannot be "a new kind of candidate" -- and simultaneously attack Hillary. 

He's also correct that the gut instinct of his consultants and advisors will always be to go on the attack.  As they say, if all you have is a hammer, you tend to think every problem is a nail... 

Speaking of nails, Brooks hits the nail on the head when he says: "... a candidate should never betray the core theory of his campaign, or head down a road that leads to that betrayal." 

Of course, Hillary wants Obama to wrestle in the mud, and the famous maxim that the pig actually enjoys it, is essentially true.

But while Brooks is primary argument is correct, he fails to address the point that Obama has lost the momentum, and that he can't regain it by doing the same things he's already been doing.   You can't overcome an opponent who has momentum by "out-nicing" them.  

In fact, the larger point is that Obama has essentially painted himself in a corner. 

He now faces a catch-22:  If he goes negative, he betrays his campaign.  But if he stays positive, Hillary will define him and "steal' the election ...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos