John Cornyn Will Be a Texas Thom Tillis and That’s Awful
Here Are the Two People DNI Gabbard Issued Criminal Referrals for Concerning...
Idiot Math
AI Nude Deepfakes Becoming a Dire Issue in Schools
Pocahontas Wants to Spend Jeff Bezos’s Money
The Pope, Three Cardinals, and the Iran War
In Israel, Garbage Trucks Bring the Garbage
The Implosion of Eric Swalwell: What Was He Thinking?
Debunking Five Tax Day Myths
My Advice to (Young) Women
Immigration in America: Legal Pathways, Border Reality, and the Fight Over Who Belongs
Trump’s Hormuz Masterstroke: How American Energy Dominance Is Exposing China’s Fatal Weakn...
New York Can’t Claim 'Choice' While Silencing It
U.S. Secret Service Seized 13 Card Skimmers in Dallas, Saving $13.5M in Fraud
Six House Republicans Vote to Advance Temporary Protected Status to Haitians for Three...
Tipsheet

The UK Supreme Court Dealt a Major Blow to Transgender Activists

The UK Supreme Court Dealt a Major Blow to Transgender Activists
AP Photo/Rick Bowmer

On Wednesday, the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court ruled that transgender women do not fit the legal definition of “woman.”

Justice Patrick Hodge clarified that all five judges agreed that “the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’” in the country’s Equality Act, established in 2010, “refer to a biological woman and biological sex.”

Advertisement

“The Equality Act 2010 gives transgender people protection, not only against discrimination, but through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment," he said, asserting that a person who “identifies” as transgender person with documentation recognizing them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes.

According to the New York Post, this definition was debated beginning in 2018 (via NYP):

The definition was challenged in 2018 after the Scottish Parliament passed a law stating that women should make up 50% of the representatives on Scottish public boards.

Scottish officials later said female representation included trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate, which offers legal recognition of someone’s female sex under the Equality Act, to meet the quota.

Women Scotland (FWS), the women’s rights group that brought the legal challenge, argued the Scottish officials’ redefinition of women went beyond Parliament’s powers.

“Not tying the definition of sex to its ordinary meaning means that public boards could conceivably comprise 50% men, and 50% men with certificates, yet still lawfully meet the targets for female representation,” the group’s director, Trina Budge, had previously said.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER

This legal challenge was reportedly rejected in 2022, but the plaintiffs were permitted to take the challenge to the nation’s high court. 

Going forward, this landmark ruling could impact sex-based rights and single-sex facilities across the country, clarifying that men who masquerade as women cannot enter women’s spaces.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement