Trump Administration Threatens Oregon Leaders With Criminal Prosecution for Letting Illega...
Democrat Family’s Grip on Power in South Texas Faces New Test As Sheriff...
Mamdani's Embittered Fourth of July Rant to America
A DoorDash Driver Joined the Unemployment Line Over Her Treatment of DHS Orders
A NYC Museum Sent Its Teddy Roosevelt Statue to North Dakota, but Is...
Mamdani Map of New York Neighborhoods 'Mistakenly' Erased This Demographic Group
Democratic Socialist Melat Kiros Says This Is Needed to 'Tackle White Supremacy'
Top NYT Editor Says He Probably Wouldn't Have Run the Kristof Rape Dog...
Ro Khanna Claims Enforcing Immigration Law Violates Human Rights
The Democrats' Escalating War on Democracy
The Price of Saying What Was True
It's Not Just Democrats Who Have Lost Faith in the Free Market
Spencer Pratt Says the Real Problem With California Isn’t the Vote Counting—It Starts...
Scott Jennings Reveals the Real Reason Democrats Turned on Graham Platner
This House Democrat Is Trying to Save Face After Voting Against Tax Cuts
Tipsheet

The UK Supreme Court Dealt a Major Blow to Transgender Activists

The UK Supreme Court Dealt a Major Blow to Transgender Activists
AP Photo/Rick Bowmer

On Wednesday, the United Kingdom’s Supreme Court ruled that transgender women do not fit the legal definition of “woman.”

Justice Patrick Hodge clarified that all five judges agreed that “the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’” in the country’s Equality Act, established in 2010, “refer to a biological woman and biological sex.”

Advertisement

“The Equality Act 2010 gives transgender people protection, not only against discrimination, but through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment," he said, asserting that a person who “identifies” as transgender person with documentation recognizing them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes.

According to the New York Post, this definition was debated beginning in 2018 (via NYP):

The definition was challenged in 2018 after the Scottish Parliament passed a law stating that women should make up 50% of the representatives on Scottish public boards.

Scottish officials later said female representation included trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate, which offers legal recognition of someone’s female sex under the Equality Act, to meet the quota.

Women Scotland (FWS), the women’s rights group that brought the legal challenge, argued the Scottish officials’ redefinition of women went beyond Parliament’s powers.

“Not tying the definition of sex to its ordinary meaning means that public boards could conceivably comprise 50% men, and 50% men with certificates, yet still lawfully meet the targets for female representation,” the group’s director, Trina Budge, had previously said.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER

This legal challenge was reportedly rejected in 2022, but the plaintiffs were permitted to take the challenge to the nation’s high court. 

Going forward, this landmark ruling could impact sex-based rights and single-sex facilities across the country, clarifying that men who masquerade as women cannot enter women’s spaces.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement