Men Are Going to Strike Back
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ As Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
Tipsheet

Oklahoma Judge Blocks ‘Heartbeat’ Abortion Law From Taking Effect

AP Photo/Jorge Saenz

On Monday, an Oklahoma County District Judge blocked laws that would have outlawed abortion after fetal heartbeat detection and banned abortions not necessary to save the mother’s life.

Advertisement

District Court Judge Cindy Truong allowed temporary injunctions against both laws, though she did not block a slew of laws that placed restrictions on abortion.

One of the laws allowed to go into effect requires abortion doctors to be board-certified in obsetrics and gynecology. Additionally, Trunong refused to block enforcement of two laws surrounding abortion medication.These laws would increase regulations, including a mandatory three-day waiting period, on the two-dose abortion pill taken at early stages of pregnancy.

According to The Oklahoman, abortion advocacy groups and providers plan to appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court to get all the laws blocked. Recent reports have claimed that Oklahoma abortion clinics are currently inundated following the enaction of S.B. 8 in Texas, a new law that outlaws abortion after fetal heartbeat detection. 

On the contrary, the Oklahoma Attorney General's office released a statement applauding Truong for upholding three of the laws, but argued that all five should have been upheld.

"While we believe all five laws challenged in this suit are constitutional, I applaud Judge Truong for at least upholding three commonsense abortion regulations that will protect Oklahomans. The plaintiffs in this case have indicated they will appeal, and my office will continue to vigorously defend the pro-life laws enacted by the people’s representatives. On appeal, we will continue to argue that all five of the challenged laws should be upheld because the Oklahoma Constitution does not protect the right to abortion,” the statement said.

Advertisement

This fall, the Supreme Court will hear arguments for the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case that surrounds a Mississippi law that would ban abortions at 15 weeks gestation. Dobbs has the potential to overturn precedents set by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Last week, a federal appeals court in Georgia stayed its review of an abortion case to wait and see the high court’s ruling in Dobbs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement