Fathers Who Stay
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 325: God's Greatest Quotes From the Torah
What Democrats Have Done to a Once-Great American City
What We Celebrate
Christian Giants Stand Up to Pride
Toronto Star Columnist Wants to Abolish Father's Day
DHS Says Iranian World Cup Team Tried to Smuggle IRGC Members Into the...
Minnesota Attorney General Ellison Storms Off When Asked About Minnesota's Billions in Fra...
Trump Just Confirmed These Rumors About UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer
The Reactions to This Trump Podcast Quote Have Been Absolutely Hilarious
Trump Issues New Warning to Keep Iran in Line on the Strait of...
Honoring the Fathers Who Shape Our Lives
The Pastors and the American Revolution
‘Unlocking’ the Charlie Kirk Generation
Canadian Museum for Human Rights Faces Backlash Over Anti-Zionist 'Nakba' Exhibit
Tipsheet

Oklahoma Judge Blocks ‘Heartbeat’ Abortion Law From Taking Effect

Oklahoma Judge Blocks ‘Heartbeat’ Abortion Law From Taking Effect
AP Photo/Jorge Saenz

On Monday, an Oklahoma County District Judge blocked laws that would have outlawed abortion after fetal heartbeat detection and banned abortions not necessary to save the mother’s life.

Advertisement

District Court Judge Cindy Truong allowed temporary injunctions against both laws, though she did not block a slew of laws that placed restrictions on abortion.

One of the laws allowed to go into effect requires abortion doctors to be board-certified in obsetrics and gynecology. Additionally, Trunong refused to block enforcement of two laws surrounding abortion medication.These laws would increase regulations, including a mandatory three-day waiting period, on the two-dose abortion pill taken at early stages of pregnancy.

According to The Oklahoman, abortion advocacy groups and providers plan to appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court to get all the laws blocked. Recent reports have claimed that Oklahoma abortion clinics are currently inundated following the enaction of S.B. 8 in Texas, a new law that outlaws abortion after fetal heartbeat detection. 

On the contrary, the Oklahoma Attorney General's office released a statement applauding Truong for upholding three of the laws, but argued that all five should have been upheld.

"While we believe all five laws challenged in this suit are constitutional, I applaud Judge Truong for at least upholding three commonsense abortion regulations that will protect Oklahomans. The plaintiffs in this case have indicated they will appeal, and my office will continue to vigorously defend the pro-life laws enacted by the people’s representatives. On appeal, we will continue to argue that all five of the challenged laws should be upheld because the Oklahoma Constitution does not protect the right to abortion,” the statement said.

Advertisement

This fall, the Supreme Court will hear arguments for the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case that surrounds a Mississippi law that would ban abortions at 15 weeks gestation. Dobbs has the potential to overturn precedents set by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Last week, a federal appeals court in Georgia stayed its review of an abortion case to wait and see the high court’s ruling in Dobbs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement