CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Democrat Attacks Christians, Calls Muslim Jihad on the West a 'Middle Eastern Version...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Arizona Attorney General Claims Vaccine Mandate for Public Employees Is 'Illegal'

AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File

Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich (R) announced Tuesday that a vaccine mandate implemented in Tuscon for public employees is illegal.

In a press release, published yesterday, Brnovich announced that Tuscon’s mandate violates two pieces of legislation previously enacted – S.B. 1497 and Executive Order 2021-18. Through the “S.B. 1497 Investigation,” the attorney general’s findings showed that Tuscan’s Ordinance 11869 violates state law, as it requires proof of COVID-19 vaccines for city employees and shows how the city attempted to circumvent state law.

Advertisement

In Executive Order 2021-18, it states it “prohibits the state and any city, town, or county from requiring a person to be vaccinated against COVID-19.” Additionally, it states “earned paid sick time shall be provided for employees when a public health official has determined that the person is a risk to the community’s public health whether or not the person has a communicable disease.”

The investigation notes that Tuscon adapted their ordinance on Aug. 13 and required public employees to submit proof of vaccination by 4 p.m. on Aug. 24. “The Office notes that the City’s obvious effort to circumvent state law raises serious concerns about the equities of requiring city employees to get a vaccine contrary to the clear policy objective set forth by the Arizona Legislature,” the investigation claims. “It is self-evident that any negative side effects of a vaccine will not be undone merely on the general effective date of legislation. And it will be cold comfort to city employees that state law unambiguously protects them after they were required to obtain a vaccine that they would not otherwise have obtained in the first place.”

Advertisement

In a statement published Tuesday, Brnovich spoke out against the ordinance, calling it “illegal” and emphasizing that COVID-19 vaccines should be a choice, not mandated.

“Tucson’s vaccine mandate is illegal, and the city could be held liable for attempting to force employees to take it against their beliefs,” Brnovich said in the statement. “COVID-19 vaccinations should be a choice, not a government mandate.”

According to the press release, Tucson must rescind or amend the ordinance or risk losing millions of dollars in state funding. Furthermore, the attorney general stated that Tuscon employees should feel comfortable refusing to take the vaccine if the city tries to impose it. 

“[I]f the City of Tucson does not rescind its policy within the next 30 days, the AGO will notify the Arizona Treasurer, who will withhold the city’s portion of state shared revenue until it comes into compliance,” the release states. “Additionally, the AGO believes the City of Tucson could subject itself to potential liability claims if it were to take adverse action against an employee who relies on E.O. 2021-18 and state law to refuse the vaccine.”

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos