You Won't Believe What Nancy Pelosi Told Don Lemon After His Arrest
We Now Know Whether ICE Will Show Up to the Super Bowl
Election (D)enialism
Miami's Democrat Mayor Just Admitted She's Undermining Immigration Laws
Media Critique of Firearm Industry Protection Bill Misses Major Point
JD Vance Praises Trump’s Sincerity: 'The Polar Opposite' of Washington
Israeli-American Hostage Keith Siegel Reunites With His Wife at the White House, Thanks...
This Law Firm Says Singer's Admission of 'Stolen Land’ Gives Native American Tribe...
Warning Signs for Republicans in 2026
Four Charged Over Allegedly Using 100+ Stolen Identities to Defraud SNAP Program
Utah Man Pleads Guilty to $89M Investment Fraud That Targeted Over 200 Victims
Attempted Trump Assassin Sentenced To Life Following Federal Trial
U.S. Rep. Barry Loudermilk Won’t Seek Reelection
Secret Service Sweeps Cities Nationwide To Shut Down EBT Skimming Fraud
Jury Nails Ex-NFL Player Who Allegedly Defrauded Medicare of Nearly $200M
Tipsheet

Trump Has One Major Condition for Signing Defense Bill

AP Photo/Evan Vucci

President Trump said Tuesday he will veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless Congress terminates Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which offers legal protections to social media giants. 

Advertisement

“Section 230, which is a liability shielding gift from the U.S. to “Big Tech” (the only companies in America that have it—corporate welfare!), is a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity. Our Country can never be safe & secure if we allow it to stand,” Trump tweeted. “Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill when sent to the very beautiful Resolute desk. Take back America NOW. Thank you!”

While critics have long argued that Twitter, Facebook, and other social media sites target conservatives, those accusations became clear to see in the way the tech giants censored the Hunter Biden story in the weeks leading up to the election, which Sen. Ted Cruz said amounted to “election interference.” They believe if these companies are behaving like publishers they should no longer enjoy the legal protections of Section 230, which shields them from being held liable for content published on their platforms. 

Advertisement

The Department of Justice sent a letter to congressional leaders in October expressing an openness to change Section 230.

"The Department of Justice (Department) is encouraged by the emerging consensus in each branch of government and many parts of the private sector that the time has come to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996," Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd wrote in the letter. "Today’s large online platforms hold tremendous power over the information and views available to the American people. It is therefore critical that they be honest and transparent with users about how they use that power."

During a Senate Commerce Committee hearing in October, the CEOs of Twitter, Facebook, and Alphabet, Google's parent company, all spoke about the importance of Section 230 to the work they do. 

"Section 230 is the Internet’s most important law for free speech and safety," Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said. "Weakening Section 230 protections will remove critical speech from the Internet."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos