Our Friend and Patriot Is Running for Congress
Supreme Court Just Made a Decision In Tiger King's Case
Senate Fails to Pass House DHS Funding Bill During Today's Brief Pro Forma...
German Women Reject Relationships With 'Refugees,' and Woke Leftists Are Hardest Hit
Wisconsin Democrats Have a Big Weakness in the Election. Here's What It Is.
We Now Know Why MI Democratic Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Didn't Address Khamenei's...
This Is How Gavin Newsom and His Wife View Red States
Fordham Law Professor Says Trump Is Right on Certain Aspects of Birthright Citizenship
This Green Proposal Would Put an End to the City That Never Sleeps
Politico Embarasses Itself With Fawning Story About Rahm Emanuel's Dietary Habits
A Thief’s First Realization
After a Decade, San Francisco Discovers That Teaching Math Is Key in Ensuring...
President Trump Proclaims Confidence in DNI Tulsi Gabbard As Firing Rumors Continue to...
Rubio Torches George Stephanopoulos As He Lays Out Iran War Objectives: 'You Should...
'Huge Mistake': Tim Burchett Blasts Senator Thune After 2 AM DHS Bill Leaves...
Tipsheet

Trump Has One Major Condition for Signing Defense Bill

Trump Has One Major Condition for Signing Defense Bill
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

President Trump said Tuesday he will veto the National Defense Authorization Act unless Congress terminates Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which offers legal protections to social media giants. 

Advertisement

“Section 230, which is a liability shielding gift from the U.S. to “Big Tech” (the only companies in America that have it—corporate welfare!), is a serious threat to our National Security & Election Integrity. Our Country can never be safe & secure if we allow it to stand,” Trump tweeted. “Therefore, if the very dangerous & unfair Section 230 is not completely terminated as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), I will be forced to unequivocally VETO the Bill when sent to the very beautiful Resolute desk. Take back America NOW. Thank you!”

While critics have long argued that Twitter, Facebook, and other social media sites target conservatives, those accusations became clear to see in the way the tech giants censored the Hunter Biden story in the weeks leading up to the election, which Sen. Ted Cruz said amounted to “election interference.” They believe if these companies are behaving like publishers they should no longer enjoy the legal protections of Section 230, which shields them from being held liable for content published on their platforms. 

Advertisement

The Department of Justice sent a letter to congressional leaders in October expressing an openness to change Section 230.

"The Department of Justice (Department) is encouraged by the emerging consensus in each branch of government and many parts of the private sector that the time has come to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996," Assistant Attorney General Stephen E. Boyd wrote in the letter. "Today’s large online platforms hold tremendous power over the information and views available to the American people. It is therefore critical that they be honest and transparent with users about how they use that power."

During a Senate Commerce Committee hearing in October, the CEOs of Twitter, Facebook, and Alphabet, Google's parent company, all spoke about the importance of Section 230 to the work they do. 

"Section 230 is the Internet’s most important law for free speech and safety," Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey said. "Weakening Section 230 protections will remove critical speech from the Internet."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement