Democrats Are Walking Into a Minefield
The One Dem No One Is Going to Miss If He Loses Next...
How Brandon Gill Got the President of the American Bar Association All Tongue-Tied...
Special Counsel Jack Smith Is Referred for Criminal Prosecution. Here's Why.
After the Arizona Primaries, Total Fury Erupts Over Establishment Dems' Election Meddling
Secret Service Director Says Threats Against Trump and Other Protectees Are 'Off the...
So That's Why Some Crazed Migrant Executed Three People in Minnesota?
Sophie Cunningham Shuts Down Reporter Over Her Stance on Transgender Athletes in Women's...
A Bunch of Democrats Joined a Livestream Where the DSA Attacked America and...
Mamdani Was Asked About Arresting Hamas War Criminals, and His Answer Was Revealing
James Talarico Continues Pandering to Voters, This Time by Supporting Reparations
Play-Acting to Destruction
Trump's War Critics Discuss Everything — Except the Point
Break Google’s Monopoly for Good
Save Our Elections to SAVE America
Tipsheet

Jury Reaches Verdict in Pulse Shooting Trial

Jury Reaches Verdict in Pulse Shooting Trial

Noor Salman has been found not guilty of obstruction of justice and providing material support to a terrorist organization.

Salman is the widow of the deceased gunman Omar Mateen who killed 49 people and injured more than 50 others at Pulse nightclub in 2016. 

Advertisement

Jurors came to the decision after three days of deliberation.

According to prosecutors, Salman helped Mateen before the massacre, including by scouting out potential targets and knowing he was buying ammunition for the attack. Additionally, they argued she then lied to the FBI in an attempt to thwart the investigation. 

"This case is about what she knew and what she did," Assistant US Attorney Sara Sweeney said. "The defendant didn't pull the trigger that night, but she did serve as a green light for her husband."

Attorneys for Salman argued she was a simple woman who was kept in the dark about Mateen's plans. 

"She doesn't go to the mosque, she searches for Hello Kitty on her website," defense attorney Charles Swift said in his closing argument. "We're supposed to believe she had long conversations with Omar Mateen about jihads?"

After her arrest, however, she told the FBI she knew Mateen was going to do something violent.

"I wish I had done the right thing, but my fear held me back. I wish I had been more truthful," she wrote in the statement. 

Defense lawyers argued that Ms. Salman’s statement, obtained after more than 11 hours of questioning without a lawyer present, amounted to a false confession. Ms. Salman told investigators that she and Mr. Mateen scouted Pulse as a target, yet investigators found no evidence to corroborate that.

“She was a suspect, and they wanted to get a confession — except that she was still denying that she knew anything,” a defense lawyer, Charles D. Swift, said during his closing argument on Wednesday.

Jurors were asked to decide whether Ms. Salman had aided and abetted her husband’s support of a foreign terrorist organization.

James D. Mandolfo, an assistant United States attorney, acknowledged during his opening statement on March 14 that the case against Ms. Salman was not built around a single incriminating fact but rather on the “totality” of evidence regarding her support of Mr. Mateen. (NYT)
Advertisement

Mateen, who pledged allegiance to ISIS, was killed by police hours after the massacre. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement