The Elon Musk Nazi Salute Story Got More Interesting
For Pardoned J6 Defendants From PA, A New Nightmare Might Be Looming
NYT Article on Trump's Inauguration Shows the Media Still Doesn't Get It
Greg Gutfeld Just Took His Fox Co-Host to the Cleaners Over Trump and...
Trump Drops a Late Night Post Torching Lib Pastor Who Lectured Him During...
Pardon Me About Birthright Citizenship
The End of ESG
Tom Homan's 'Collateral Arrests' Comment Stuns CNN Host
Trump Administration Reinstates This Nation as State Sponsor of Terrorism
Wray Warned Biden Against Commuting the Sentence of Convicted Cop Killer. He Did...
The Visionary Foolishly Underestimated for Decades Is Now the Greatest President in U.S....
A Border Patrol Agent Was Killed at This Northern Border Sector
Trump’s Gender Policy Is Correct and Sensical But Will Likely Face Legal Challenges
American Power
Pardons Show the Need to Downsize DOJ
Tipsheet

Irish Magazine Defends Decision to Publish Cover With Bullseye on Trump's Head

Irish magazine Village is defending the provocative cover of its February issue that pictures President Trump with a bullseye on his head. Worse yet, the image was accompanied by the words “why not” in big, bold letters.

Advertisement

.@lukemcmanus @SiobhanDowling.. @VillageMagIRE are just as edgy. if that is the right word. which it isn't. pic.twitter.com/UCHO07Sjfc

— Luke Clancy (@lukeclancy) February 7, 2017

But the magazine said Tuesday that it’s not encouraging violence of any sort toward the president. Their reasoning? Because there is no question mark after “why not.”

It reads 'WHY NOT'. Then it links to the editorial which duly EXPLAINS WHY NOT https://t.co/YC7rP1GXeL ? would signal equivocation or worse https://t.co/2UJjFU8VDx

— Village Magazine (@VillageMagIRE) February 7, 2017

While the article discussed the act of killing a tyrant, which it wrote “has had support from various philosophers and theologians through the centuries,” they noted that doing so in Trump’s case was “unnecessary and disproportionate.”  

“Trump is a fool, he will alienate friends and enrage enemies. He will breach the constitution, illegally enrich himself, fall out with his allies and make evidence-unsupported mistakes,” the article reads before making the moral case for not assassinating the 45th president of the United States.

Advertisement

Their reasoning is that the American public will then be made aware (during his inevitable impeachment or resignation) of the “dangers of allowing power to an intolerant narcissist.” This awareness, the authors state, will bring about change: “institutions will be reformed, progressive policies enshrined and popular opinion inured against ever repeating the Trump mistake.”

“The calculus is clearly against violence, even in the case of Trump,” the Village concludes. “Stick to democracy, rigorously but applied, as necessary, stealthily and aggressively.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement