NYPD Chief Blasts AOC's Defense of Pro-Hamas Agitators
Terrorists Launch Attacks on Americans Building Biden’s Gaza Pier
The Pro-Hamas Activist Who Accosted Alec Baldwin Went Totally Insane During Piers Morgan...
Iran-Backed Terrorists Resume Attacks on U.S. Service Members in the Middle East
White House Attempt to Cover for Biden's Latest Gaffe Might Be Its Most...
Stocks Tank After Disastrous First Quarter GDP Report
US, 17 Other Nations Issue Joint Statement Calling on Hamas to Release Hostages
Florida Has Carried Out an Impressive Evacuation Operation in Haiti
Biden Administration's New Overtime Rule Blasted as an 'Attack on Small Businesses'
Students at Another Ivy League University Get Ready to Set Up Encampment
The Left Would Prosecute Trump for Acts He Never Committed, But Obama Did
Another Poll on Battleground States Is Here to Toss Cold Water on Biden's...
Could Texas Ban ‘Gender Nonconforming’ Teachers From Schools?
Should Republicans Be Concerned About the Pennsylvania Primary Results?
Mike Davis' Internet Accountability Project Calls on Senate Republicans to Break Up Big...
Tipsheet

Microstamping Law Forces Smith & Wesson to Stop Selling New Guns in California

Smith & Wesson announced Wednesday that it would rather stop selling its handguns in California than comply with the state’s new microstamping law, which “requires that all new semi-automatic pistols that are not already on the state’s approved gun roster have the microstamping technology,” The Washington Times reports.

Advertisement

AWR Hawkins explains what the technology is:

Microstamping is a requirement that each firearm be fitted with a special firing pin that leaves a fingerprint on a bullet casing which differs from the fingerprint of every other firearm. In other words--every one of the wildly popular Smith & Wesson M&P .45 semi-automatic handguns would have to be manufactured in such a way so that no two of them left the same mark on a shell casing.

However, independent studies have shown that microstamping is unreliable and ineffective for law enforcement, not to mention costly for manufacturers.

“As our products fall off the roster due to California’s interpretation of the Unsafe Handgun Act, we will continue to work with the NRA and the NSSF to oppose this poorly conceived law which mandates the unproven and unreliable concept of microstamping and makes it impossible for Californians to have access to the best products with the latest innovations,” Smith & Wesson President and CEO James Debney said, the Times reports.

California isn’t the only place to have mandated this technology, however.

The District of Columbia is the only other place in the country that has mandated microstamping. It was supposed to go into effect on Jan. 1, but the city council passed an emergency measure in December to postpone it until 2016.

A spokesman for Phil Mendelson, the city council chairman who wrote the D.C. law, told me that, “The decision to delay was made recently in order to piggyback on the California program and create more of a market for gun manufacturers.”

In other words, there were no manufacturers willing to stick this unproven contraption on their firearms, which meant no new ones could be sold in the city.

Advertisement

Second Amendment advocates and those in the firearms industry recognize that the new technology is nothing less than a ban on guns.

“We’re being forced out of the state by the California Department of Justice,” Ruger CEO Mike Fifer told Guns.com. “This insistence on microstamping, which doesn’t work, is denying you your rights to have access to these guns.”

Ruger also announced this month that it will stop offering new semi-automatic firearms in California.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement