Oh, Here's Another Policy Abigail Spanberger and VA Dems Support That Screws Over...
So, That New VA Congressional Map That Dems Want Could Get Tossed
Trump Just Won Huge Concession From Iranian Regime
Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Religious Freedom Case
Rabid Animal Rights Activists Swarm Beagle Research Facility to Steal Dogs
This Bill Would Create 'Homelessness Courts' and Ban Camping on Public Property
Trump Just Went Scorched Earth on Supreme Court Over Recent Rulings
Democrats and the Media Go to Bat for the Southern Poverty Law Center
Gun Control Calls Follow Shreveport Shooting, but There's an Issue
Here's Why The Situation In Iran is Looking Disastrous For China
Iran Just Reached For Another Piece of Leverage As The IRGC Threatens to...
Europe Gathers to Plan Securing the Strait of Hormuz—Once the United States Finishes...
Longtime Georgia Democrat, Congressman David Scott, Dies at 80
Iran State Media and Officials Are Reportedly Ready for the War to Resume
AI Data Centers: The New Populist Target
Tipsheet

Microstamping Law Forces Smith & Wesson to Stop Selling New Guns in California

Microstamping Law Forces Smith & Wesson to Stop Selling New Guns in California

Smith & Wesson announced Wednesday that it would rather stop selling its handguns in California than comply with the state’s new microstamping law, which “requires that all new semi-automatic pistols that are not already on the state’s approved gun roster have the microstamping technology,” The Washington Times reports.

Advertisement

AWR Hawkins explains what the technology is:

Microstamping is a requirement that each firearm be fitted with a special firing pin that leaves a fingerprint on a bullet casing which differs from the fingerprint of every other firearm. In other words--every one of the wildly popular Smith & Wesson M&P .45 semi-automatic handguns would have to be manufactured in such a way so that no two of them left the same mark on a shell casing.

However, independent studies have shown that microstamping is unreliable and ineffective for law enforcement, not to mention costly for manufacturers.

“As our products fall off the roster due to California’s interpretation of the Unsafe Handgun Act, we will continue to work with the NRA and the NSSF to oppose this poorly conceived law which mandates the unproven and unreliable concept of microstamping and makes it impossible for Californians to have access to the best products with the latest innovations,” Smith & Wesson President and CEO James Debney said, the Times reports.

California isn’t the only place to have mandated this technology, however.

The District of Columbia is the only other place in the country that has mandated microstamping. It was supposed to go into effect on Jan. 1, but the city council passed an emergency measure in December to postpone it until 2016.

A spokesman for Phil Mendelson, the city council chairman who wrote the D.C. law, told me that, “The decision to delay was made recently in order to piggyback on the California program and create more of a market for gun manufacturers.”

In other words, there were no manufacturers willing to stick this unproven contraption on their firearms, which meant no new ones could be sold in the city.

Advertisement

Second Amendment advocates and those in the firearms industry recognize that the new technology is nothing less than a ban on guns.

“We’re being forced out of the state by the California Department of Justice,” Ruger CEO Mike Fifer told Guns.com. “This insistence on microstamping, which doesn’t work, is denying you your rights to have access to these guns.”

Ruger also announced this month that it will stop offering new semi-automatic firearms in California.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement