Nobody’s Calling London
CNN Produces a Romance Thriller for the NYC Bombers, and David French Backs...
The Democrats’ Republic of Iran
Should the Supreme Court Reconsider New York Times v. Sullivan?
Do Public Schools Need a 'Jan. 6 Insurrection' Course?
Fix What's Broken at Home so We Can Defend Ourselves Abroad
Blue-State Suicide
Protect the Border and the Ballot Box
The Sin of Accepting Support From Jews
Iran’s New Supreme Leader: The Rise of Mojtaba Khamenei
Is Proof of Citizenship Really Jim Crow 2.0
A Landmark Verdict Sparks the Collapse of Youth Gender-Affirming Surgeries, but True Justi...
SAVE Act Lifted by Paxton-Cornyn Race
The Left Is Really Mad That We Bought Our Troops Steak and Lobster...
Trump Is Bringing Historic Changes to the U.S. Energy Sector
Tipsheet

Here's How Northam's Office Is Defending His Comments About Leaving Infants to Die After Birth

Here's How Northam's Office Is Defending His Comments About Leaving Infants to Die After Birth
AP Photo/Steve Helber

Ofirah Yheskelm, a spokesperson for Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D), released a statement late Wednesday on the remarks Gov. Northam made on WTOP earlier defending leaving infants born alive to die when he was asked about a late-term bill.

Advertisement

“It’s done in cases where there may be severe deformities, there may be a fetus that’s nonviable,” Northam said of third trimester abortions. “So in this particular example, if a mother’s in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered, the infant would be kept comfortable, the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”

Many people, including Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Ben Sasse (R-NE), expressed outrage at these remarks which seemed to endorse letting infants die after birth.

Northam’s spokesperson claimed in her statement that the governor’s comments were only referencing cases such as a nonviable pregnancy or severe fetal abnormality.

"No woman seeks a third trimester abortion except in the case of tragic or difficult circumstances, such as a nonviable pregnancy or in the event of severe fetal abnormalities, and the governor's comments were limited to the actions physicians would take in the event that a woman in those circumstances went into labor,” Yheskel said in the statement.

Advertisement

“Attempts to extrapolate these comments otherwise is in bad faith and underscores exactly why the governor believes physicians and women, not legislators, should make these difficult and deeply personal medical decisions,” she added.

While that response narrows down what infants the governor was talking about, it does not dispute the claim that the governor was discussing allowing infants to die after birth in the case he broadly referred to as “severe deformities,” in addition to “nonviable” infants who are likely to die anyway shortly after birth.

Many on Twitter pointed out that the term “severe fetal abnormalities” encompasses a swath of diagnoses and can mean infants with Down syndrome or Trisomy 18.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement