Ridiculous: Judge Orders Construction Trump's White House Ballroom to Be Halted
Why Eric Swalwell Sent a Cease and Desist Letter to the FBI
Trump Just Made a Major Announcement About Iran
Judge Demands Radical Judge's Impeachment After She Freed Predator Who Killed a Five-Year-...
Florida Attorney General Takes Bold Stance on Gun Rights Despite Criticism From Prosecutor...
Gavin Newsom's Press Office Trips Over His Own Ego As He Attacks Trump's...
Sherrod Brown Attends Fundraiser Hosted by Disgraced Politicians, a Felon, and a Racist
The Los Angeles Times Is Now Interested in Covering the CCP-Linked Biolab Story...
Guess Which Demographic Group Is Throwing Support Behind the Reform UK Party
A Palm Beach Election Volunteer Was Arrested Days After a Special Election and...
Man Charged With Robbing Teen Out of Jail After Gun Possession Arrest at...
The Daily Mail Fuels Charlie Kirk Conspiracy Theories With Ignorant X Post
The Strait of Hormuz or the Gays of Hormuz—Watch This Actual Conversation With...
Nancy Pelosi Claims GOP Could Steal 2026 Midterms As Democrats Say Elections Are...
Ben Ferguson: It's Almost Like the Democratic Party Went to AI and Said...
Tipsheet

Buttigieg on Criticism Over Comments About Racist Roads: ‘the Point Is Not to Make America Feel Guilty’

Buttigieg on Criticism Over Comments About Racist Roads: ‘the Point Is Not to Make America Feel Guilty’
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg responded to criticism over comments he made earlier this month, when he asserted that bridges and highways are racist, by saying in an interview aired Sunday that "the point is not to make America feel guilty" but to fix what he sees as inequities in America's infrastructure.

Advertisement

During an interview on MSNBC’s "The Sunday Show," host Jonathan Capehart asked Buttigieg to address critics who cast doubt on his claim that some bridges and highways were built with racist intentions.

"What we’re doing is we are reconnecting people who may have been disconnected or divided by discriminatory decisions in the past," Buttigieg said. "That helps everybody. I don’t know why anybody would be against reconnecting people who have been divided by discriminatory decisions in the past. 

"And again, the point is not to make America feel guilty," he continued. "The point is to make America better and more equitable and more effective in moving people to where they need to go. The point of transportation is to connect, so if a transportation was ever used to divide, we have a responsibility, a moral one but also a very practical one, to fix it."

Advertisement

The interview comes after Buttigieg made controversial comments about alleged racism in bridges and highways during a Nov. 8 White House briefing, when he was speaking about the bipartisan infrastructure bill.

"I’m still surprised that some people were surprised when I pointed to the fact that if a highway was built for the purpose of dividing a white and a black neighborhood, or if an underpass was constructed such that a bus carrying mostly black and Puerto Rican kids to a beach, or that would have been in New York, was designed too low for it to pass by, that that obviously reflects racism that went into those design choices," Buttigieg said at the time.

And while conservatives on Twitter immediately slammed Buttigieg following his remarks earlier this month, The Washington Post’s fact-checker Glenn Kessler defended the secretary, highlighting a passage from Robert Caro’s Pulitzer-Prize winning book, "The Power Broker," a biography of New York civic planner Robert Moses.

A Transportation Department official confirmed to Kessler that Buttigieg was making a reference to Caro’s book.

Advertisement

But Kessler later admitted that experts have increasingly doubted the validity of Caro's racist bridge story.

"Obviously this cannot be easily resolved," Kessler wrote. "Caro quotes one of Moses’ top aides as saying the height of the bridges was done for racist reasons, but increasingly that story has been questioned as not credible. Buttigieg should tailor his remarks to reflect what is historically unimpeachable – and we should be more careful to double-check on the latest views of historians. Even a Pulitzer Prize-winning book is not always the last word on a subject."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement