Wait, That's the Reasoning Behind Minnesota's Anti-ICE Lawsuit Against the Federal Governm...
A CNBC Host Delivered One Remark That Wrecked a Dem Senator's Entire Narrative...
A Reporter in the WH Press Pool Tried to Hide Who She Worked...
Chevron Showdown: Supreme Court Weighs Energy Lawfare and Rogue Courts
Why Free Speech Scares the Hell Out of the Left
A Tough Week for PBS As It Struggles With Defunding – and Struggles...
Mark Ruffalo and His Hollywood Comrades Turned Golden Globes Into Anti-ICE Protest
Aaron Rupar Worries the U.S. Won't Survive President Trump Enforcing Immigration Laws
Mortgage Rates Fall to Three-Year Low
Trump Says the US is 'Screwed' if Supreme Court Strikes Down His Liberation...
Radio Host Resigns After Calling for the Assassination of Vice President JD Vance
Elizabeth Warren Calls on Democrats to Double Down on Progressive Economics
Mark Kelly Files Lawsuit Against Pete Hegseth Following ‘Seditious Six' Censure Effort
Trump Signals Exxon Could Be Shut Out of Venezuela Oil Opportunities As the...
Progressive Squad Member Calls Trump a ‘Dictator,’ Demands ICE Be Abolished Following Deat...
Tipsheet

Amy Coney Barrett Says the Supreme Court Is 'Not Comprised of a Bunch of Partisan Hacks'

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett addressed public concerns surrounding the perceived politicization of the high court, saying in a speech over the weekend that it is not a partisan institution.

Advertisement

"My goal today is to convince you that this court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks," Barrett told a crowd Sunday at the University of Louisville, according to the Courier-Journal. "Judicial philosophies are not the same as political parties."

Barrett then cited several cases where the bench did not rule along party lines.

"The media, along with hot takes on Twitter, report the results and decisions," Barrett said before adding that this "makes the decision seem results-oriented" and "leaves the reader to judge whether the court was right or wrong, based on whether she liked the results of the decision."

"And here's the thing: Sometimes, I don't like the results of my decisions," she continued. "But it's not my job to decide cases based on the outcome I want."

The Trump-appointed justice also pointed out, according to POLITICO, that the bench should be "hyper vigilant to make sure they’re not letting personal biases creep into their decisions, since judges are people, too."

Advertisement
This comes after the Supreme Court voted in a 5-4 decision not to block Texas’ new abortion law that bans the procedure after a baby’s heartbeat is detected. 
During her contentious Senate confirmation last year, pro-choice advocates argued that Barrett, a pro-life Catholic, would allow her personal beliefs to dictate her rulings as a justice and could threaten abortion rights in America.

Some Democrats and liberal media pundits even went as far as to compare her faith to the regime depicted in the show, "The Handmaid's Tale."

Barrett, however, shot down assertions that she would allow her beliefs to influence her rulings on the bench, telling a Senate panel last year that she has "an agenda to stick to the rule of law and decide cases as they come."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos