The One Question the Media Wouldn't Ask at the White House Press Briefing...
Here's the Question That Really Got Under Tim Walz's Skin
Trump Is About to Tell Us Which Candidate He Wants for Texas Senate
Police Warned the Fairfax County Prosecutor About the Violent Illegal Alien Who Murdered...
Legendary Notre Dame Football Coach Lou Holtz Has Died Aged 89
Jim Jordan Exposed Tim Walz's Dishonesty at Oversight Committee Hearing on Minnesota Fraud
Senator Kennedy Shares His Honest, and Funny, Thoughts on the Death of Khamenei
Wyoming Sheriffs Have Problem Preserving Second Amendment
Iranian Women's Rights Activist Calls Out Kamala Harris Silence on Regime's Atrocities: 'W...
Despite What Democrats May Tell You, Americans Want the SAVE Act
Victor Davis Hanson Explains Why This Time The War in the Middle East...
Kurdish Forces in Iraq Have Launched a Ground Invasion Against Iran
Honduran National Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Assaulting ICE Officer in Oklahoma City
U.S. Senate Rejects Measure to Halt Strikes on Iran
Japanese National Who Allegedly Tried to Sell Plutonium to Fake Iranian General Sentenced...
Tipsheet

Justice Breyer on Court Packing: Americans 'Will Lose Trust in the Court'

Justice Breyer on Court Packing: Americans 'Will Lose Trust in the Court'
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said Sunday that the proposal from several Democrats to pack the court could lead to the American people losing faith in the bench.

Advertisement

In an interview with Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday," Breyer warned that Democrats' efforts to expand the Supreme Court to allow President Joe Biden to appoint several justices could lead to the court losing public trust.

"Well, if one party could do it, I guess another party could do it," Breyer said. "On the surface, it seems to me, you start changing all these things around and people will lose trust in the court."

The Clinton appointee, however, is not opposed to all reform regarding the Supreme Court, telling Wallace that he is open to the idea of term limits for justices.

"I think you could do that. It should be a very long-term because you don't want the judge who's holding that term the start thinking about his next job," Breyer said. "But it would make life easier for me."

And while Justices Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg had remained on the bench until their deaths, the 83-year-old Breyer said that he does not "intend to die on the court. I don't think I'll be there forever."

This comes amid calls from Democrats for Breyer to retire while Democrats still have control the White House and the Senate, allowing a liberal justice to take his place before the Republicans have the opportunity to flip the Senate in the 2022 midterm elections. 

Advertisement

Breyer said there are"many considerations" that go into his decision about the timing of his retirement.

"There are many factors, in fact, quite a few," he said. "And the role of the court and so forth is one of them. And the situation, the institutional considerations are some. And I believe, I can't say I take anything perfectly into account, but in my own mind, I think about those things."

"I didn't retire because I decided on balance I wouldn't retire," he continued.

Breyer went on to say that, despite the political lens that many people view the court and the selection of justices in the current day, he does not serve just one party, but rather, he serves all Americans.

"I'm there for everybody. I'm not just there for the Democrats. I'm not just there for the Republicans. And I'm not just there because the president was a Democrat who appointed me," he said. "It's a very great privilege to be in that job. And part of it is to remember that you're there for everyone. They won't like what you say half the time – or more. But you're still there for them."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement