The 2028 GOP Nominee Is Going to Be JD Vance, Probably
Democrats Sure Hate Jews
May I Do the Thinking, Please?
Who’s the Boss? Trump, That’s Who
The Art of War, Not the Deal
The Last Hurrah of the RINO Establishment
Memorial Day: America’s Transcendent Holiday
The Poisonous Proposal That Should Alarm Every American
Illinois Woman Sentenced to Prison for Leading 14-Person Pandemic Loan Fraud Scheme
The Numbers That Ended The Late Show: $100M Budget, $40M Loss, 2.7M Viewers
10-Time Felon Allegedly Posed as Successful Businessman to Swindle Elderly Woman Out of...
The RNC Just Scored a Major Election Security Victory in North Carolina
Mangione Superfan Who Celebrated Brian Thompson's Alleged Murder Is Daughter of CVS Health...
Marco Rubio Just Torched the Panicans Crying Over the Iran Peace Deal
Wait, This Democrat Candidate Refuses To Say the Pledge?
Tipsheet

There's an Update on Kamala's Plagiarism Scandal

There's an Update on Kamala's Plagiarism Scandal
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

On Monday journalist Christopher Rufo detailed how Democratic presidential candidate and Vice President Kamala Harris lifted major portions of her book, "Smart on Crime," from Wikipedia, press releases and other sources without citation.

Advertisement

But it turns out the very institutions tasked with holding officials accountable for plagiarism covered for Harris and are now admitting they were wrong. 

That plagiarism expert, New York Times’ consultant Jonathan Bailey, had more to say in Plagiarism Today

"At the time, I was unaware of a full dossier with additional allegations, which led some to accuse the New York Times of withholding that information from me. However, the article clearly stated that it was my ‘initial reaction’ to those allegations, not a complete analysis," Bailey wrote. "I reviewed the complete dossier prepared by Dr. Stefan Weber, whom I have covered before. I also performed a peer review of one of his papers in 2018. With this new information, while I believe the case is more serious than I commented to the New York Times, the overarching points remain. While there are problems with this work, the pattern points to sloppy writing habits, not a malicious intent to defraud."

Advertisement

Related:

2024 ELECTION

"Is it problematic? Yes. But it’s also not the wholesale fraud that many have claimed it to be. It sits somewhere between what the two sides want it to be," he continued. 

Days into the scandal the Harris-Walz campaign has failed to comment on the situation.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement