It Seems Like We Need to Look Into This Regarding the Dems' Candidate...
Speaker Johnson Had a Legislative Hat Trick Today While Thune Wants to Sell...
Police Chief Secretly Installs AI Surveillance Cameras, Then Justifies It After Getting Bu...
New NRCC Ad Blasts Socialist Amish Shah As Dangerous for Arizona Families
Who Are the Bullies Again?
Abdul El-Sayed Is Losing Black Voters, So the Damage Control Has Begun
WisDems Are Begging for an Early Voting Ballot Do-Over
Press Struggles With Immigrant Voting It Denies Happening; 'The View' Has Its Dress...
Minnesota Man Sentenced to 30 Months for $1.18M Tax Refund Scheme
70th Defendant Pleads Guilty in $250 Million Feeding Our Future Fraud
Maryland Audit: $2 Million Lottery Winner Kept Collecting Food Stamps
Day 12: U.S. Pounds Iran to Protect Ships in Strait of Hormuz
Rashida Tlaib Goes to Bat for Mamdani, Says She'll Help Arrest Netanyahu
New Jersey Man Sentenced to 48 Months in $4 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Congressional Stock Trading Is About to Get Much Harder
Tipsheet

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military
AP Photo/Francisco Seco

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said on ABC's "This Week" he would not implement a ban on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military should the longshot entrepreneur become commander-in-chief.

Advertisement

"Would you reinstate the ban on transgender members of the military?" Martha Raddatz asked.

"I would not reinstate a ban on transgender members. I would, however, be very clear that for kids, that's where my polices are very focused. We should not be foisting this ideology onto children," Ramaswamy replied.

"But you would not ban transgender members of the military?" Raddatz pressed.

"I would not," Ramaswamy repeated.

Ramaswamy further elaborated his position in a lengthy post on Twitter:

"If someone wants to serve our country, they should be able to serve so long as they don’t create risk or undue cost for other Americans. The risk of letting someone with a mental health problem serve in combat roles is too high, but for most roles in the military (administrative, support, legal, etc.), I don’t think a categorical ban makes sense. If a trans adult can’t serve as a JAG attorney, why should they be able to serve as a public prosecutor, defense attorney, local cop, fireman, doctor, or nurse either?" he wrote.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER
 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement