How About a Dignity Act for Actual Americans?
Here Are Trump's Options Now That Peace Talks With Iran Have Collapsed
This Dem's Claim About Gas Prices Got Eviscerated by This Tweet
Graham Platner Has a New Explanation for His Nazi Tattoo. It's a Doozy.
With Swalwell Out in CA Gov Race, Does This Mean Kamala Is Coming...
The Reactions to This Moment From Sabrina Carpenter's Performance at Coachella Were Pure...
Congress Is Gearing Up for Their Version of the Purge. Here's Who's on...
Why Everyone Tracking Oil Tanker Traffic Is Pleased to See Where They're Heading
The Locust Left Shows You Who Not to Vote for: A Handy Guide
'Parents Need to Be Aware': High-Profile Transgender Cases Shaping America's Battle Over P...
NATO: No Action, Talk Only
The Insulting DIGNITY Act
Trust Iran? Why?
Critical Race Theory: On the Ropes but Lingering
Funded Silence: Congress Shields Itself While Lecturing Everyone Else
Tipsheet

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military
AP Photo/Francisco Seco

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said on ABC's "This Week" he would not implement a ban on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military should the longshot entrepreneur become commander-in-chief.

Advertisement

"Would you reinstate the ban on transgender members of the military?" Martha Raddatz asked.

"I would not reinstate a ban on transgender members. I would, however, be very clear that for kids, that's where my polices are very focused. We should not be foisting this ideology onto children," Ramaswamy replied.

"But you would not ban transgender members of the military?" Raddatz pressed.

"I would not," Ramaswamy repeated.

Ramaswamy further elaborated his position in a lengthy post on Twitter:

"If someone wants to serve our country, they should be able to serve so long as they don’t create risk or undue cost for other Americans. The risk of letting someone with a mental health problem serve in combat roles is too high, but for most roles in the military (administrative, support, legal, etc.), I don’t think a categorical ban makes sense. If a trans adult can’t serve as a JAG attorney, why should they be able to serve as a public prosecutor, defense attorney, local cop, fireman, doctor, or nurse either?" he wrote.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER
 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement