What Will Happen When the Ladies on The View Die?
Politico With the Weakest Scoop on Lindsey Graham's Replacement
With Extreme Poverty at All-Time Lows, Democratic Socialists Hope to Reverse the Trend
More Than a Machine: Big Boy No. 4014 Sparks a Nationwide Reunion
Jew Are You?
California’s Ethnic Studies Retreat Masks a National Classroom Movement
Bread, Bombs, and Bankruptcy: Iran's Theocracy Faces Its Final Reckoning
Hollywood Snubs Its Own Audience, Then Wonders Why It's Broke
Mother Nature Is Out to Get Me
Why I Put President Trump's Name on Palm Beach's Airport
World Cup Star Erling Haaland Made Some Hilarious Texan Purchases Before His Return...
Iranian Drones in Cuba? Here's What Trump Knows.
Rents Hit All-Time High in Mamdani's NYC As Millionaires Make Mass Exodus
Iran Launches Strikes Against Maritime Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz
Twelve Democrat States Block Paramount Merge with Warner Bros
Tipsheet

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military
AP Photo/Francisco Seco

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said on ABC's "This Week" he would not implement a ban on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military should the longshot entrepreneur become commander-in-chief.

Advertisement

"Would you reinstate the ban on transgender members of the military?" Martha Raddatz asked.

"I would not reinstate a ban on transgender members. I would, however, be very clear that for kids, that's where my polices are very focused. We should not be foisting this ideology onto children," Ramaswamy replied.

"But you would not ban transgender members of the military?" Raddatz pressed.

"I would not," Ramaswamy repeated.

Ramaswamy further elaborated his position in a lengthy post on Twitter:

"If someone wants to serve our country, they should be able to serve so long as they don’t create risk or undue cost for other Americans. The risk of letting someone with a mental health problem serve in combat roles is too high, but for most roles in the military (administrative, support, legal, etc.), I don’t think a categorical ban makes sense. If a trans adult can’t serve as a JAG attorney, why should they be able to serve as a public prosecutor, defense attorney, local cop, fireman, doctor, or nurse either?" he wrote.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER
 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement