14 Years Ago Today, The Giants and Jets Faced Off...and Put One Team...
Four Years Ago, Some Patriot Dropped an Epic Line on a Call With...
DK Metcalf Just Lost a Lot of Money for Punching a Detroit Lion's...
Merry Christmas, Over a Million More Files Potentially Related to the Epstein Case...
Supreme Court Ruled on Trump's Use of National Guard In This Blue State
Christmas Eve With J.R.R. Tolkien
2025 Media Malpractice Recognized With the Heckler Awards Pt. 2 — The Individual...
Bari Weiss Is Everything Today’s Journalists Hate
Another Left-Wing Judge Just Decided He's Got More Authority Than President Trump
Popular Neo-Nazi to Campaign Against Vivek Ramaswamy in Ohio Gubernatorial Race
Stephen Miller Blasts CBS for Sympathizing With Criminal Illegal Immigrants
Federal Judge Blocks California Policy Forcing Schools to Hide Gender Transitions From Par...
98 Minnesota Mayors Warn of Fiscal Fallout After State Spends $18 Billion Surplus
ICE Agents Fired at Incoming Van in Maryland
Federal Judge Rules That Michigan Cannot Disrupt International Line 5 Pipeline
Tipsheet

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military

AP Photo/Francisco Seco

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said on ABC's "This Week" he would not implement a ban on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military should the longshot entrepreneur become commander-in-chief.

Advertisement

"Would you reinstate the ban on transgender members of the military?" Martha Raddatz asked.

"I would not reinstate a ban on transgender members. I would, however, be very clear that for kids, that's where my polices are very focused. We should not be foisting this ideology onto children," Ramaswamy replied.

"But you would not ban transgender members of the military?" Raddatz pressed.

"I would not," Ramaswamy repeated.

Ramaswamy further elaborated his position in a lengthy post on Twitter:

"If someone wants to serve our country, they should be able to serve so long as they don’t create risk or undue cost for other Americans. The risk of letting someone with a mental health problem serve in combat roles is too high, but for most roles in the military (administrative, support, legal, etc.), I don’t think a categorical ban makes sense. If a trans adult can’t serve as a JAG attorney, why should they be able to serve as a public prosecutor, defense attorney, local cop, fireman, doctor, or nurse either?" he wrote.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER
 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos