Did This Issue Catapult Japanese Conservatives to a Landslide Win in Their Elections?
US Women's Hockey Team Clubbed the Canadians Like Baby Seals Yesterday. Oh, and...
Lisa Murkowski Just Stabbed Her Party in the Back on the SAVE Act
Why This Girl Wrestler Had Shock and Horror All Over Her Face? It's...
Bill Maher Reveals Why He Got the COVID Vaccine...and He's Rather Annoyed About...
Iran Is Preparing for a US Airstrike – Here's What Trump Is Saying
Man's Best Friend: Mystery Dog Helps Louisville Police Find Missing Toddler
Sen. Alex Padilla Gets Dragged for Sharing a Letter From Detained Migrant Child
The January Jobs Report Is Here
TX State Rep. Harrison Calls for Gene Wu to Be Stripped of Committee...
Check Out This Ridiculous Axios Headline About Plummeting Crime Rates
Police Released Person of Interest Detained in Guthrie Disappearance. Here's What We Know.
Report: The FAA Closed El Paso Airspace After Mexican Cartel Drone Incursion; Airspace...
Justice Jackson Defends Her Grammys Appearance As 'Part of the Job'
Steve Hilton Promises a ‘Political Revolution’ in California, and He’s Leading in the...
Tipsheet

This 2024 GOP Candidate Would Not Implement a Transgender Ban in the Military

AP Photo/Francisco Seco

Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy said on ABC's "This Week" he would not implement a ban on transgender individuals serving in the U.S. military should the longshot entrepreneur become commander-in-chief.

Advertisement

"Would you reinstate the ban on transgender members of the military?" Martha Raddatz asked.

"I would not reinstate a ban on transgender members. I would, however, be very clear that for kids, that's where my polices are very focused. We should not be foisting this ideology onto children," Ramaswamy replied.

"But you would not ban transgender members of the military?" Raddatz pressed.

"I would not," Ramaswamy repeated.

Ramaswamy further elaborated his position in a lengthy post on Twitter:

"If someone wants to serve our country, they should be able to serve so long as they don’t create risk or undue cost for other Americans. The risk of letting someone with a mental health problem serve in combat roles is too high, but for most roles in the military (administrative, support, legal, etc.), I don’t think a categorical ban makes sense. If a trans adult can’t serve as a JAG attorney, why should they be able to serve as a public prosecutor, defense attorney, local cop, fireman, doctor, or nurse either?" he wrote.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER
 


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement