The Supreme Court Has Ruled on the Voting Rights Act
This Is What Luigi Mangione Had to Say About the WHCD Shooting
Here's What Cole Allen Did in the Weeks Leading Up to the WHCD...
Jake Tapper Once Condemned 'Stochastic Terrorism,' but Seems to Have Forgotten That As...
Tim Walz Was Destroyed by the DOJ for Trying to Take Credit for...
With SCOTUS VRA Ruling, GA State Senator Dolezal Calls on Gov. Kemp to...
SCOTUS Just Ruled in Favor of a Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Targeted by New...
Remember When Jimmy Kimmel Didn't Like This Joke From Aaron Rodgers? We Do.
Sic Semper Tyrannis, According to the Media
Middle School Kids Honored for Act of Heroism on Their School Bus
While LA's Still Rebuilding, Karen Bass Announces Massive Renovation Project at Griffith P...
Checkmate: Trump’s Real Leverage
The Florida House Advances the State's New Congressional Map
This Is Not Free Speech: Acting AG Todd Blanche Blasts Democrats for Defending...
The 'Warmth of Collectivism' Is Catching Up to Mamdani As He Begs NY...
Tipsheet

Sen. Blumenthal Whines ACB's Views on the 2A Could Overturn Gun Laws Across the Country

Sen. Blumenthal Whines ACB's Views on the 2A Could Overturn Gun Laws Across the Country
AP Photo/Matthew Daly

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) used his time to attack Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on her views on the Second Amendment, saying if confirmed, her views could threaten gun control laws across the county.

Advertisement

Blumenthal accused Senate Republicans of being the ones who want activist judges to "legislate from the bench and strike down laws supported by a vast majority of the American people. And that activism uses originalism as a smokescreen," adding Barrett will strike down the Affordable Care Act and abortion rights.

"An activist judge on the bench doing what Congress could not do would also strike down common-sense gun safety laws. Connecticut has been at the forefront on gun violence protection, on gun safety, Judge, you acknowledged that your dissenting opinion in Kanter sounds kind of radical. That’s because it is," he continued. "But if your views on the Second Amendment are adopted by the Supreme Court, it would imperil common-sense state laws, like Connecticut’s, all around the country."

Barrett dissented in Kanter v Barr by stating non-violent felons should not permanently lose their right to own a firearm:

Advertisement

"History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. But that power extends only to people who are dangerous. Founding-era legislatures did not strip felons of the right to bear arms simply because of their status as felons. Nor have the parties introduced any evidence that founding-era legislatures imposed virtue-based restrictions on the right; such restrictions applied to civic rights like voting and jury service, not to individual rights like the right to possess a gun."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos