Did You Catch What This Democrat Wants DOJ to Do Next?
Lawmakers Applaud HHS for Move Involving Wuhan Institute of Virology
Guess What Iran Did Right After Biden Gave Them $6 Billion
IRS Official Describes Whistleblower Gary Shapley As a 'Fantastic' Agent
Ex-NYT Reporter Flees Podcast After Being Asked About Hunter Biden Reporting
Eagle Pass, TX Faces Most Difficult Challenge This Year With Surge of Illegal...
As the Border Crisis Rages on, DHS Just Made a Move That Affects...
Ken Paxton Tells Tucker Carlson Who He Thinks Was Behind Failed Effort to...
Massive Number of Migrants Traveling Toward US Border Is Now Affecting International Trade...
Pro-Abortion Organization Rebrands Ahead of the 2024 Election, Showing Its ‘True Agenda’
Round Two: Fact-Checking Another Common Media Talking Point on Abortion
Virginia Democrats Go for New Low Right Before Statewide Elections
What's Next for Kari Lake? Here's What Reports Are Saying.
Randi Weingarten Brutally Fact-Checked, Again
Leaked Veterans Affairs Training Video Claims Men Can Get Pregnant, Promotes Abortion

Sen. Blumenthal Whines ACB's Views on the 2A Could Overturn Gun Laws Across the Country

AP Photo/Matthew Daly

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) used his time to attack Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett on her views on the Second Amendment, saying if confirmed, her views could threaten gun control laws across the county.


Blumenthal accused Senate Republicans of being the ones who want activist judges to "legislate from the bench and strike down laws supported by a vast majority of the American people. And that activism uses originalism as a smokescreen," adding Barrett will strike down the Affordable Care Act and abortion rights.

"An activist judge on the bench doing what Congress could not do would also strike down common-sense gun safety laws. Connecticut has been at the forefront on gun violence protection, on gun safety, Judge, you acknowledged that your dissenting opinion in Kanter sounds kind of radical. That’s because it is," he continued. "But if your views on the Second Amendment are adopted by the Supreme Court, it would imperil common-sense state laws, like Connecticut’s, all around the country."

Barrett dissented in Kanter v Barr by stating non-violent felons should not permanently lose their right to own a firearm:


"History is consistent with common sense: it demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns. But that power extends only to people who are dangerous. Founding-era legislatures did not strip felons of the right to bear arms simply because of their status as felons. Nor have the parties introduced any evidence that founding-era legislatures imposed virtue-based restrictions on the right; such restrictions applied to civic rights like voting and jury service, not to individual rights like the right to possess a gun."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos