It Seems Like We Need to Look Into This Regarding the Dems' Candidate...
Speaker Johnson Had a Legislative Hat Trick Today While Thune Wants to Sell...
Police Chief Secretly Installs AI Surveillance Cameras, Then Justifies It After Getting Bu...
Turns Out New Jersey's Voter Fraud Hurts Immigrants, Too
New NRCC Ad Blasts Socialist Amish Shah As Dangerous for Arizona Families
Who Are the Bullies Again?
Abdul El-Sayed Is Losing Black Voters, So the Damage Control Has Begun
WisDems Are Begging for an Early Voting Ballot Do-Over
Press Struggles With Immigrant Voting It Denies Happening; 'The View' Has Its Dress...
Minnesota Man Sentenced to 30 Months for $1.18M Tax Refund Scheme
70th Defendant Pleads Guilty in $250 Million Feeding Our Future Fraud
Maryland Audit: $2 Million Lottery Winner Kept Collecting Food Stamps
Day 12: U.S. Pounds Iran to Protect Ships in Strait of Hormuz
Rashida Tlaib Goes to Bat for Mamdani, Says She'll Help Arrest Netanyahu
New Jersey Man Sentenced to 48 Months in $4 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Tipsheet
Premium

The Truth About Red State Voter ID Laws

The Truth About Red State Voter ID Laws
AP Photo/Richard Drew

The SAVE America Act has been the talk of right-wing politics for a number of months now. It promises to secure our elections by validating citizenship at the time of registration and confirming identity at the time of voting. These are great initiatives, and the legislation should be passed when the vote occurs on Wednesday. 

Sadly, it is almost certain that it is doomed to die in the Senate, as too many in the GOP simply lack the will to save our country by doing what is necessary to get it over the finish line. We know that Democrats will set aside the silent filibuster the moment they regain power, and yet many Republicans would prefer to politely lose on the issue so they can have a fight about “norms” and “procedure” when the next blue administration comes around.

Thankfully, many red states have moved to advance voter ID laws to protect the integrity of their elections. The sad reality is that, in some states, those laws are not nearly as strict as the average voter might think. Let’s take my home state of Texas, for example:

Texans proudly tout our “robust” voter ID laws. We are told that there are seven forms of “approved” ID that would allow you to cast a ballot. You could use various forms of ID, from a passport to an “Election Identification Certificate,” all of which are legitimate ways to authenticate your identity at the polls and, in combination with a citizenship verification system, would be a significant step toward securing elections in the state. If you read the fine print, however, the door of acceptable forms of identification opens quite widely if you somehow can’t present one of those forms of ID.

Texas permits prospective voters to use a utility bill, bank statement, or paycheck as long as they fill out a Reasonable Impediment Declaration. You can also use an expired ID for up to 4 years (or indefinitely if you’re 70 years old). Is it any wonder that an illegal was just caught voting in Texas?

Texas isn’t the only one. Many red states have eerily similar laws. Nearly half of U.S. states require a form of photo ID to vote, but in 11 of those states, individuals can provide alternative forms of ID. Many of those are deep red states at that. Nebraska, South Carolina, South Dakota, Idaho, Louisiana, and Indiana are all included.

Of course, creating a strict national standard would ensure that all elections have much stricter security. The SAVE Act is an avenue to achieve that. On Wednesday, GOP senators who are on the fence about creating that standard will be given an out by allowing the silent filibuster to remain in place in a betrayal of the desires of President Trump and his base.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement