Men Are Going to Strike Back
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ As Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Tipsheet

UPDATED: This story isn't real, right?

RNC Chairman Michael Steele has reportedly spent about $2,000 of donors' money at a bondage-themed nightclub in Hollywood.

According to a new Federal Election Commission filing, Steele spent $1,946.25 at Voyeur West Hollywood, which features topless women in
Advertisement
what one Yelp reviewer called "a really sexy/gothic experience." That experience would include women imitating oral sex, according to many reports.

In the same trip, Steele spent $9,099 at the Beverly Hills hotel and $6,596 at a Four Seasons.

My headline suggests disbelief, but if proven true, this could be enough for Steele's ouster. It seems so incredible, though, that I've got to hold out for something like card theft. The RNC has not yet commented.

UPDATE:


National Review touches base with a RNC spokesman:
We are investigating the expenditure in question. The story willfully and erroneously suggests that the expenditure in question was one belonging to the chairman. This was a reimbursement made to a non-committee staffer. The chairman was never at the location in question, he had no knowledge of the expenditure, nor does he find the use of committee funds at such a location at all acceptable. Good reporting would make that distinction crystal clear. The committee has requested that the monies be returned to the committee and that the story be corrected so that it is accurate.

In other words, "Steele's expenses," may not necessarily have been "Steele's expenses." It might have been the expenses of one of the staffers under his charge.

More developments are sure to follow...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement