The Squad Has a Meltdown Over Pro-Terrorism Encampments Getting Dismantled
Joe Biden Again Threatens to Halt More Arms Shipments to Israel
Joe Biden Just Lost Another Battle With His Teleprompter
PolitiFact Hates Facts From Campuses
Police Officer Stuck in BLM Nightmare
Rep. Brian Mast Has Perfect Response to Pro-Hamas Activists Ambushing Him
Speaker Mike Johnson Gets to Keep His Job
Prosecutor Leading Stormy Daniels Questioning In Trump Trial Is a Major Biden Donor
Trump Finds Brilliant Way to Sidestep Judge Merchan's Unconstitutional Gag Order
Lloyd Austin Confirms Delay in Aid to Israel: 'We’ve Paused One Shipment of...
Here’s Why This Democrat Rep Thinks NPR Is 'Necessary’ for Americans
Department of Education's Move Forces Jewish Groups to Pull Out of Meeting
Sickening: 'Newcomer' Illegal Immigrant Arrested in Florida for Heinous Crime
The IRA Is Punishing Small Businesses and Putting Cancer Patients at Risk
House Dems Are Asking for Executive Action on the Border, but KJP of...
Tipsheet

UPDATED: This story isn't real, right?

RNC Chairman Michael Steele has reportedly spent about $2,000 of donors' money at a bondage-themed nightclub in Hollywood.

According to a new Federal Election Commission filing, Steele spent $1,946.25 at Voyeur West Hollywood, which features topless women in
Advertisement
what one Yelp reviewer called "a really sexy/gothic experience." That experience would include women imitating oral sex, according to many reports.

In the same trip, Steele spent $9,099 at the Beverly Hills hotel and $6,596 at a Four Seasons.

My headline suggests disbelief, but if proven true, this could be enough for Steele's ouster. It seems so incredible, though, that I've got to hold out for something like card theft. The RNC has not yet commented.

UPDATE:


National Review touches base with a RNC spokesman:
We are investigating the expenditure in question. The story willfully and erroneously suggests that the expenditure in question was one belonging to the chairman. This was a reimbursement made to a non-committee staffer. The chairman was never at the location in question, he had no knowledge of the expenditure, nor does he find the use of committee funds at such a location at all acceptable. Good reporting would make that distinction crystal clear. The committee has requested that the monies be returned to the committee and that the story be corrected so that it is accurate.

In other words, "Steele's expenses," may not necessarily have been "Steele's expenses." It might have been the expenses of one of the staffers under his charge.

More developments are sure to follow...

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement