Are Buttigieg’s Latest Airline Rules Going to Get People Killed?
These Ugly, Little Schmucks Need to Face Consequences
Top Biden Aides Didn't Have Anything Nice to Say About Karine Jean-Pierre: Report
The Terrorists Are Running the Asylum
Biden Responds to Trump's Challenge to Debate Before November
Oh Look, Another Terrible Inflation Report
Senior Sounds Off After USC Cancels Its Main Graduation Ceremony
There's a Big Change in How Biden Now Walks to and From Marine...
US Ambassador to the UN Calls Russia's Latest Veto 'Baffling'
Southern California Official Makes Stunning Admission About the Border Crisis
Another State Will Not Comply With Biden's Rewrite of Title IX
'Lack of Clarity and Moral Leadership': NY Senate GOP Leader Calls Out Democratic...
Liberals Freak Out As Another So-Called 'Don't Say Gay Bill' Pops Up
Here’s Why One University Postponed a Pro-Hamas Protest
Leader of Columbia's Pro-Hamas Encampment: Israel Supporters 'Don't Deserve to Live'
Tipsheet

Ashcroft Is Free, To Say Whatever He Wants

Freeeeeeeee-dom.

I'm usually not so nonchalant with such an important word, but John Ashcroft sure repeated it a lot in his 20-minute speech before a full auditorium here at CPAC this afternoon. It wasn't a bad thing; the word is very fitting for a man like him, and if anyone has permission to have "freedom" as their schtick, it's Ashcroft. But goodness. The man isn't afraid of being repetitious.
Advertisement


Ashcroft, who served as Attorney General under Bush after serving as Missouri's Senator and Governor, clearly is an old-timer among the CPAC regulars. But he's got timeless appeal. And though he was a little heavy on the use of the word "freedom," he had some very detailed things to say about it. In a nutshell, Ashcroft argued that freedom was the one main core value of America, that it is broader and more at risk than ever before, that we need to work to expand it, and that we need to be transparent and forthcoming about it.

But he did so in way that went far deeper than simply singing freedom's praise.
At one time, we could only threaten a nation with another nation. But now we know that just a few people could threaten a nation with just a few chemicals.
I thought it was thoughtful and genuine, but his speaking style was received with mixed emotions by the audience. Take his fourth point:
Advertisement

The defense of freedom requires an integrity in vocabulary, and transparency in policy.
That got a blank stare from the audience. But the he followed it up with:
...I think when defending freedom, if you refuse to call a war a war, you're unlikely to defend it successfully.
That was met with enthusiastic applause.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement