Where the Hell Is the DOJ?
Trump Gives the Response America Really Needs to Terrorists on Campus
Guess Who Will Receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom?
What We Are Seeing Happen on College Campuses Is Really a Class War
How a Black Man Reacted When a White Pro-Hamas Supporter Told Him He...
Why Pierre Poilievre Got Ejected from the Canadian House of Commons This Week
Another Arab Country Rejects Hosting Hamas Terrorist Leaders
UPDATED: Democrat Rep. Henry Cuellar Indicted on Federal Bribery Charges
It's Been Another Terrible Week for 'Bidenomics'
How Is the Biden Admin Going to Explain Away This April Jobs Report?
Watch: WH Declines to Deny Leaked Proposal to Bring Gaza 'Refugees' to US
Biden Admin Finally Acknowledges What's Happening With Gaza Aid
Here's How Biden Chose to Commemorate the Dobbs Leak
Spoiled Brats at Columbia Have a New Ludicrous 'Demand'
JD Vance Schools CNN on 'Bogus' Case Against Trump
Tipsheet

Another Creative Way To Pretend A Public Mandate Is Constitutional

This one's from Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.). The Constitution “charges Congress with the health and well-being of the people," according to Lincoln.

Unfortunately, as
Advertisement
CNS News points out, "the words 'health' and 'well-being' do not appear anywhere in the Constitution."

Congress' own Budget Office has determined that the U.S. has never required Americans to buy any good or service. But the Supreme Court still might rule the mandate to purchase insurance as constitutional. National Journal's Stuart Taylor Jr. explains why:
It's true that the proposed mandate, like much else that congress has done since the New Deal, would extend federal powers far beyond anything envisioned by the Framers. The commerce clause, in particular, was not intended to allow Congress to regulate activities that were neither interstate nor commercial.

But the need to govern an ever-more interconnected nation, in which once-local activities such as health care have become critical components of the national economy, has spawned a long line of precedents expanding the commerce power, especially since the justices began upholding New Deal programs in 1937.
As Taylor points out, whether those precedents are justified is an entirely separate matter.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement