Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
Tipsheet

Hearings, Cont'd

She's doing a good job of avoiding questions, generally. Her statements on abortion are sanitized, her statements on race directly contradict what she's said in the past, and her approach to eminent domain is noncommittal.
Advertisement


On Roe v. Wade:
It is precedent and this is the Supreme Court's holding.
On Kelo v. City of New London, which supports an extremely expansive view of eminent domain:
It is now precedent, I must follow it.
On Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, which says race must be judged under "strict scrutiny," the highest level of judicial review that involves fundamental Constitutional rights and the Equal Protection Clause.
All government action that discriminated by race must be subject to strict scrutiny in the courts.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement