Paxton > Cornyn
This Fox News Host Easily Tore Through This Dem Rep's Talking Points About...
If You Think Democrats Care About You, Then You’re an Idiot
The Press Admits It Only Trusts Iran; Loyola U. Newspaper Apologizes for Insulting...
The Political Instant Replay
From the 'Only in Israel' Desk
Exclusive 'Interview': Gavin Newsom on His Possible Presidential Launch
How Will Congress Choose to Handle the Iran Bill?
Better Rude and Truthful Than Smooth and Deceitful
Is the American Empire Doomed to Crumble?
Nearly 150 Servicemembers’ Cars Auctioned Off Illegally, DOJ Lawsuit Alleges
Daycare Director Allegedly Stole $2.75M, Spent It on Wrestling Events, Luxury Goods, and...
Double Standard? Dems Backed Expulsion Before, Now Quiet on Alleged $5M FEMA Fraud.
Loyola University Paper Apologizes for Calling Murder Suspect an 'Illegal Immigrant'
New GOP Governor Poll Shows Tight Michigan Primary Race Between James and Johnson
Tipsheet
Premium

Texas Supreme Court Ruling Allows Judges to Refuse to Marry Same-Sex Couples

Texas Supreme Court Ruling Allows Judges to Refuse to Marry Same-Sex Couples
Zachary Zulock (Facebook)

The Texas Supreme Court ruled on Friday that state judges can refuse to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies if it violates their “sincerely held religious beliefs.”

In a unanimous decision, the court amended the Texas Code of Judicial Conduct in a way that would mean judges would not face sanctions if they do not officiate a same-sex union.

From Kera News:

Texas judges who decline to perform a wedding ceremony based on a “sincerely held religious belief” do not violate the state’s rules on judicial impartiality, according to a comment the Texas Supreme Court added to the state’s judicial conduct code Friday.

The high court’s comment on Oct. 24, effective immediately, could have statewide implications for gay marriage and potentially play a role in a federal lawsuit attempting to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court decision that legalized gay marriage.

The rule change appears to answer a question of state law that the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals posed to the Texas Supreme Court in April, which was prompted by a lawsuit challenging the State Commission on Judicial Conduct’s now-withdrawn sanction of a Waco judge who refused to marry gay couples while continuing to marry straight couples. The plaintiff in that suit, a North Texas county judge, sued saying he was afraid he could face the same punishment.

The case centered on Judge Dianne Hensley, a justice of the peace in Waco, who refused to faciliate a same-sex wedding. The Texas judicial commission issued a public warning against her. She responded by filing a lawsuit.

A trial judge tossed Hensley’s legal action over procedural matters. An appeals court later upheld this ruling. However, the Texas Supreme Court revived the lawsuit to consider the dispute over religious freedom.

Hensley was not the only judge to sue the judicial commission. Judge Brian Umphress, a Jack County judge, also refused to perform these ceremonies on religious grounds. Even though he had not been sanctioned, he filed a preemptive lawsuit in 2020. A federal judge later dismissed his case, but the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals asked the Texas Supreme Court to settle the matter.

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement