Trump: We're Done Subsidizing Europe's Low Drug Prices
UPDATE: He's Out of Gaza; The Last Living American Hostage Held by Hamas...
Dems Have Two Words for Joe Biden Right Now...They're Not Complimentary
What Gavin Newsom Is Doing to Solve Homelessness Might Surprise You
They Said the DOGE Vote Was Coming. Thomas Massie Explains Why It Didn't.
This Lawmaker Is Demanding Answers About the ATF's Secret Surveillance on Lawful Gun...
ATF Has Even More to Answer For After Latest Revelations
Watch: Dem Senator Doubles Down on Males Invading Female Sports
How America Can Return to Scientific Integrity After Years of Half-Baked Studies Directing...
Chairman Mark Green Demands Answers on Abrego Garcia Traffic Stop
Did You See What Trump Said About Martha Raddatz and the Catholic Vote?
Democrats Are, Once Again, Making a Very Stupid Choice
Have We Forgotten?
Are Trump's Approval Ratings Already Going Up?
The Bureaucrats Are Out. Now It’s Congress’s Move.
Tipsheet

An Individual Mandate For Guns

Yesterday South Dakota lawmakers introduced an individual mandate that will be less savory to liberals. It requires all state citizens who are 21 or over to buy a gun. It kicks in on January 1, 2012 after which South Dakota residents have a six month grace period to purchase a firearm.
Advertisement


Rep. Hal Wick (R-Sioux Falls) told the Argus Leader that he knows the measure will fail, but it's purpose is to make a point about the individual mandate in the health care law.
“Do I or the other cosponsors believe that the State of South Dakota can require citizens to buy firearms? Of course not. But at the same time, we do not believe the federal government can order every citizen to buy health insurance."
Once government requires individuals to buy one product, why wouldn't it stop at another?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement