Here's Why I'm Concerned
The Suspect in the J6 Pipe Bombing Incident Has Been Captured. Why the...
A Newsom Nihilist Nomination?
The Importance of Being Earnest
Media Make 'Venezuelan Fishermen' the New 'Maryland Father,' and Covering Up the Minnesota...
The Welcome Demise of Climate Change Catastrophism
Making the Judiciary Great Again
Those Lazy, Hazy, Crazy Days of Skipping 'Morning Joe'
Closing the Door on Immigration? Not Yet.
Socialism Is Antithetical to the Genuine American Dream
The War Is Not Over, and There Is No Peace
U.S. Secret Service Seized 16 Illegal Skimmers, Stopped $16M in Fraud
Two Men Charged After 1,585 Pounds of Meth Found Hidden in Blackberry Shipments...
SCOTUS Upholds New Texas Redistricting Map
Georgia CEO Gets Eight Years for Bribery Scheme Involving Honduran Police Contracts
Tipsheet

WATCH: Democratic Senator Drops Another F-Bomb

Donald Trump is a vile, uncouth barbarian, they cry, so -- f*** it! -- let's emulate him, or something.  The pioneer in this realm was DNC Chairman Tom Perez, who started cursing up a storm in order to ingratiate himself with his party's ascendant and angry left-wing.  As a top emissary of the Democratic establishment, Perez has experienced icy receptions from movement activists in various settings.  One of his apparent solutions to evincing solidarity and "strength" in the eyes of his base is to lace his public remarks with expletives -- most famously his delightful formulation that unlike Republicans, Democrats "give a s**t" about people.  Tough Guy Tom refused to apologize.  Because courage and conviction, or whatever:

Advertisement


New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, hungrily devouring the role of indignant anti-Trump obstructionist, got in on the action, dropping repeated F-bombs in a recent interview about her view of public service.  Not to be outdone, California Senator Kamala Harris -- who is proving to be a fitting replacement for the departed Barbara Boxer -- joined the profanity party:

Your move, Gillibrand.  Bombs away:



Look, I don't have an especially puritanical view of such things (for instance, this is among my favorite Charles Krauthammer columns of all time), although I do prefer our leaders to at least feign interest in public comportment and propriety.  I also recognize that the Republican Party has no standing to clutch pearls over "salty language," given who they nominated for president.  I just hope the Democrats will spare us the sanctimonious "we go high" and "love trumps hate" garbage moving forward.  Mud-slinging vulgarianism is all the rage in American politics nowadays, as our discourse gets dumber, and our institutions fray.  Neither side occupies the high ground here; let's at least just be honest about that.

I'll leave you with a thought that occurs to me: There's a certain someone whose unquenchable thirst for power and acceptance compels her to shape-shift as the prevailing winds dictate.  One moment, she's a kindly "abuela," and the next minute, she's a Chardonnay-chugging everywoman coping with disappointment, just like the rest of us.  If dropping f-words is what the cool kids are doing these days (just listen to the laughter an applause from those audiences!), we should consider starting a countdown clock to the moment that you-know-who "lets one slip" in public.  Because now she's edgy af and super resist-y, you know.  And if/when that happens, it will mean only one thing: She's running.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement