Did The New York Times Criticize 'Epic Fury' Using the Man Investigated for...
Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Donald Trump Is a Great Man of History
So, What Is Normal?
JFK's Grandson Proves the Networks Still Bend the Knee to Kennedys
Trump Avoiding Repeating History in Iran
Men Are Back
The Supreme Court Should Protect Children From Predators
America Must Lead the Charge Against the Political Abuse of Religion
The Rules Were Never Meant for Them
The U.S. Needs Japan More Than Ever
For America’s 250th Birthday, Make the Senate Great Again
Tony Gonzales Suspends Campaign After Finally Admitting to the Affair He Denied for...
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
Tipsheet

Condoleezza Rice Takes Katie Couric To School on Iraq

Condoleezza Rice Takes Katie Couric To School on Iraq
Breitbart TV is highlighting this clip from Katie and Condi's chat at the Council for Foreign Relations earlier this month, and for good reason.  I'm not sure which is more striking: The flawed premises and deep bias inherent in Couric's questions, or the poise and aplomb of a former Bush administration official in defending the Iraq war -- something the White House often seemed woefully incapable of as public support for the Operation Iraqi Freedom plummeted.  Even after Rice's detailed and persuasive tutorial, Couric showed little evidence of having learned anything at all:
Advertisement




Bravo, Madame Secretary.  The full conversation can be viewed HERE.


UPDATE:  While we're on the subject of Saddam Hussein's WMD program and ambitions, it's probably worth linking to Christopher Hitchens, who argued (convincingly) in 2006 that in spite of all the political noise caused by the trumped up Valerie Plame kerfuffle, Saddam really did seek to purchase yellow cake uranium from Niger.  Larry Elder's recent column highlighted wikileaks evidence that further exonerates this claim.  In 2004, Factcheck.org also concluded that President Bush had "plenty of reason" to believe the veracity of the famous "16 words" in his 2003 State of the Union speech that helped lead us to war.  The British government still stands by the intelligence behind the former president's historic assertion.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement