Democratic Socialists Are Obsessed With Abortion
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 330: What Jesus Says About Death
Communism—the Religion of Hate
Hate Trumps It All
The Carroll Case Still Deserves a Second Look
The Bible and America’s Presidents
There Is No Good Case Against Punishing Government Program Fraud
Time and Speech Are on Freedom’s Side
Vehicle Rams Crowd at Berlin Pride Parade, Killing One, Injuring 15
Feeding Our Future Fraudster Gets 10 More Years for Trying to Buy a...
Michigan Man Arrested Over Months-Long Campaign to Threaten ICE Officers
FBI Captures Its Fourth Most Wanted in Five Weeks
Twelve Indicted in Alleged $2 Million Nike Cargo Theft Conspiracy in Memphis
Four Men Plead Guilty in $2.2 Million Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Troy Jackson Crowned As New Maine Senate Nominee
Tipsheet

Priebus on 2016 GOP Debates: I Expect We’ll Cut Out CNN and NBC

Priebus on 2016 GOP Debates: I Expect We’ll Cut Out CNN and NBC

RNC Chairman Reince Priebus recently penned a letter to CNN and NBC with an ultimatum: if you produce and run pro-Hillary Clinton propaganda films on your networks, we will exclude you from the 2016 Republican primary debates. Period. But during an interview with two journalists from the Washington Post on Tuesday, Priebus said that, in the end, he doesn’t believe either network will comply with his request. Click here to watch the full clip:

Advertisement
Priebus: "My guess is this is exactly what’s going to happen: They will produce the films, and we will cut them out. That’s what I expect to take place.”

Even more important, perhaps, than cutting out liberal networks in 2016 is reducing the total number of GOP debates. If I remember correctly, there were twenty-three or so of them. And at times, they were painful to watch and counter-productive, to put it mildly. (Note if you follow the link above how Priebus calls them “traveling circus” debates). So the RNC’s decision to reduce the total number from twenty-three to somewhere between “seven and ten” would be welcome news. Yes, as Priebus explains, the RNC cannot and will not stop presidential candidates from participating in non-RNC affiliated network debates (and his mission of binding the nomination process to a strict observance to RNC rules and regulations could be a very long way off) but this is nonetheless a positive step forward.

Too often in 2012, moderators asked the candidates loaded and offensive questions with the veiled (or explicit) purpose of embarrassing them. Sometimes it worked. Why, then, should Republicans needlessly give Democrats extra fodder for the general election when they obviously don’t need to? Ten Republican debates are more than enough for voters to analyze and appraise the candidates. And of course, it doesn’t seem likely GOP primary voters would even lament left-leaning journalists’ absence from the debates anyway.

Advertisement

In fact, this is something all Republicans could probably agree upon.

UPDATE: For some reason, I couldn't get the full video of the interview to play in my post. So be sure to follow the second link and watch it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement