Have Democrats Ever Considered Not Being Insane?
The Underreported Side of the Graham Platner Fiasco in Maine
Graham Platner Is About to Have a Very Awkward Meeting With Senate Dems...
If You're a Dem and The View of All Places Turns Its Back...
The Last Thing We Need Is Government Interference in College Sports
Scott Pelley Thinks He Runs CBS News; MS NOW Delivers a Gross of...
Politics and Failure
The West Has Already Lost
Planned Parenthood's Transgender Services Could Make Them Billions
Russia Uses Espionage Playbook to Influence Elections
The Country That Needs Talent Is Importing Welfare Dependency and Exporting Its Best
Trump’s Nationwide Shabbat and the Choices Facing American Jews
Conservatives Give Better Graduation Speeches than Liberals
Body Cam Footage Released in the Shocking Murder of Henry Nowak
Florida Scores Major Win to Keep New Electoral Map in Place
Tipsheet

Dem Rep: No, Most of My Constituents Aren't Talking About Impeachment

Dem Rep: No, Most of My Constituents Aren't Talking About Impeachment
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

Democratic Chief Deputy Whip Dan Kildee (D-MI) is not completely committed to impeaching the president. He made that rather clear on Fox News Thursday morning just a couple of hours after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced they'd be moving forward on the inquiry. 

Advertisement

Whenever he goes home, he discovers that the inquiry just doesn't have the public support that it does on Capitol Hill. What his constituents would rather see, Kildee revealed, is some progress on more pressing items.

"Mostly I hear they want us to work on issues like the prescription drug prices and trade, and the economy," he said. "Mostly the American people want us to work on the issues that affect them at the kitchen table every day."

Kildee said he supports Pelosi's decision to move forward on impeachment because he's concerned by a few elements like Trump's Ukraine requests and his apparent attempt to "obstruct" their investigation. But, he'll wait to see what's in the articles of impeachment before deciding how to vote.

Advertisement

“I’m really going to withhold judgment on any of that,” he said. “This is a moment we have to be very clear, but also cautious to not get ahead of ourselves. I want to see what those articles include.”

Instead of holding yet more hearings and talking to more witnesses who had nothing to do with the Ukraine phone call, why don't he and his colleagues get to work on a few of those policy items he mentioned? USMCA? Just a thought.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement