Mary Bruce Cites Iran Contradictions Based on Media Lies, and The Bulwark's Fluid...
Can the Left Go One Day Without Criticizing President Trump? No, They Cannot.
Police Warned the Fairfax County Prosecutor About the Violent Illegal Alien Who Murdered...
Legendary Notre Dame Football Coach Lou Holtz Has Died Aged 89
Jim Jordan Exposed Tim Walz's Dishonesty at Oversight Committee Hearing on Minnesota Fraud
Iranian Women's Rights Activist Calls Out Kamala Harris Silence on Regime's Atrocities: 'W...
Despite What Democrats May Tell You, Americans Want the SAVE Act
Victor Davis Hanson Explains Why This Time The War in the Middle East...
Three Men Plead Guilty to $88 Million 'Pre-IPO' Securities Fraud Scheme
Montana Sen. Steve Daines Won't Seek Re-Election
West Virginia Man Faces Federal Charges for Alleged Death Threats to President Trump,...
$360 Million Stolen: New Bill Targets Rampant SNAP Card Skimming
Honduran National Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Assaulting ICE Officer in Oklahoma City
U.S. Senate Rejects Measure to Halt Strikes on Iran
Japanese National Who Allegedly Tried to Sell Plutonium to Fake Iranian General Sentenced...
Tipsheet

Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript

Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is supposed to provide the witness testimony from his panel's closed door depositions to the Judiciary Committee, as the latter prepares to host their own set of hearings this week into the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Trump. But, there's one transcript yet to see the light of day - that of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Atkinson, the official who brought the whistleblower complaint about Trump's call with Ukraine to Congress, testified behind closed doors on Oct. 4 for over 8 hours, reportedly claiming the complaint was of "urgent concern." Why is Schiff hiding the transcript?

Advertisement

Intelligence committee member Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) has a pretty good guess why.

Ratcliffe's colleague, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), asked Schiff a similar question at last month's impeachment inquiry hearings and was promptly silenced by the chairman.

"Mr. Chairman, will you be prohibiting witnesses from answering questions as you have in the closed-door depositions?" she asked.

Schiff said he'd only intervene during the Q&A if he felt the whistleblower's identity was about to be revealed.

Other Judiciary Committee members, like Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA), said the whole process is "ridiculous to the extreme." The Schiff report, he added, is "a half-baked report" filled with hearsay. He and his colleagues will have little time to look it over on Tuesday before they kick off hearings Wednesday morning, Cline complained. He predicts it will be "a short set of hearings."

Advertisement

Related:

ADAM SCHIFF

As for who the Judiciary Committee wants to hear from first, Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) suggested Schiff would be an ideal candidate.

"If he chooses not to, then I really question his veracity in what he's putting in his report," Collins said.

"It's easy to hide behind a report," Collins continued. But it's another thing "to have to answer questions" on what he knew about the whistleblower and the report.

At last month's Intel Committee hearings, Schiff claimed to not know the whistleblower's identity, which raised several eyebrows.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement