It’s Time to Put Down Biden’s Dog
The Liberal Media's Description of Dianne Feinstein's Political Views Is...Interesting
The GOP Needs to Get Some of These Idiots Off Stage
FBI Finally Apprehends Man Who Fled Before Being Sentenced Over January 6 Riot
Remember That Time Dianne Feinstein Totally Owned a Bunch of Kids on Climate...
Bob Menendez Wanted to Address Corruption Charges With Dem Colleagues. Here's How They...
Elon Shames Journos by Doing Their Job, and WaPo Tells Us to...
Gingrich on GOP Primary: 'This Race Is Over'
Here's What Happened When Elon Musk Livestreamed His Visit to the Southern Border
'Trans' Student Violently Attacks Female Student
Government Shutdown 'Inevitable,' 'All But Assured' After Short-Term Spending Bill Fails
Here's What Republican Members of Congress Are Doing to Prevent Future Shutdowns
Florida School District Removes All LGBTQ+ Reading Materials
Sixth Circuit Allows Laws to Remain in Effect Protecting Children From Mutilation
DeSantis Won the Second Debate. Does it Matter?

Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript

AP Photo/Alex Brandon

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is supposed to provide the witness testimony from his panel's closed door depositions to the Judiciary Committee, as the latter prepares to host their own set of hearings this week into the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Trump. But, there's one transcript yet to see the light of day - that of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Atkinson, the official who brought the whistleblower complaint about Trump's call with Ukraine to Congress, testified behind closed doors on Oct. 4 for over 8 hours, reportedly claiming the complaint was of "urgent concern." Why is Schiff hiding the transcript?


Intelligence committee member Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) has a pretty good guess why.

Ratcliffe's colleague, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), asked Schiff a similar question at last month's impeachment inquiry hearings and was promptly silenced by the chairman.

"Mr. Chairman, will you be prohibiting witnesses from answering questions as you have in the closed-door depositions?" she asked.

Schiff said he'd only intervene during the Q&A if he felt the whistleblower's identity was about to be revealed.

Other Judiciary Committee members, like Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA), said the whole process is "ridiculous to the extreme." The Schiff report, he added, is "a half-baked report" filled with hearsay. He and his colleagues will have little time to look it over on Tuesday before they kick off hearings Wednesday morning, Cline complained. He predicts it will be "a short set of hearings."


As for who the Judiciary Committee wants to hear from first, Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) suggested Schiff would be an ideal candidate.

"If he chooses not to, then I really question his veracity in what he's putting in his report," Collins said.

"It's easy to hide behind a report," Collins continued. But it's another thing "to have to answer questions" on what he knew about the whistleblower and the report.

At last month's Intel Committee hearings, Schiff claimed to not know the whistleblower's identity, which raised several eyebrows.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos