This Former Dem Lawmaker Is Facing an Investigation Into How She Used Tornado...
There Is a Case of the DNC Hiding Its Financials and the Press...
Rep. Summer Lee Admits She Wants More Black Doctors, Even If They're Unqualified
The 'Extreme Passion' of Socialists Has a Very High Body Count
Kathy Hochul Admits Zohran Mamdani Has Lost Control of NYC's Homeless Problem
Ro Khanna Just Said This About Former Rep. Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush,...
Tim Walz's Excuse for Pardoning a Child Molester Is Despicable, Even for Him
Democrats May Love Socialism, but They Can't Get Enough Luxury on the Campaign...
The Trump Administration Is Planning to Make a Major Move Regarding Legal Immigration
JD Vance Wants to Stop Socialism. A Republican Socialism Isn't the Answer.
Former Federal Reserve Adviser Sentenced to 38 Months for Lying About Ties to...
Brandon Gill Introduces Legislation Requiring Naturalized Citizens Speak English
Texas Flooding Returns to Camp Mystic Region, Leaving One Dead and Dozens Rescued
The Biggest Foreign Corporate Investment in America Just Got Even Larger
ABC's The View Could Take a Serious Hit From the FCC Just in...
Tipsheet

Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript

Intel Committee Member Muses Why Schiff Is Blocking IG Atkinson's Transcript
AP Photo/Alex Brandon

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff is supposed to provide the witness testimony from his panel's closed door depositions to the Judiciary Committee, as the latter prepares to host their own set of hearings this week into the ongoing impeachment inquiry against President Trump. But, there's one transcript yet to see the light of day - that of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Atkinson, the official who brought the whistleblower complaint about Trump's call with Ukraine to Congress, testified behind closed doors on Oct. 4 for over 8 hours, reportedly claiming the complaint was of "urgent concern." Why is Schiff hiding the transcript?

Advertisement

Intelligence committee member Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX) has a pretty good guess why.

Ratcliffe's colleague, Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), asked Schiff a similar question at last month's impeachment inquiry hearings and was promptly silenced by the chairman.

"Mr. Chairman, will you be prohibiting witnesses from answering questions as you have in the closed-door depositions?" she asked.

Schiff said he'd only intervene during the Q&A if he felt the whistleblower's identity was about to be revealed.

Other Judiciary Committee members, like Rep. Ben Cline (R-VA), said the whole process is "ridiculous to the extreme." The Schiff report, he added, is "a half-baked report" filled with hearsay. He and his colleagues will have little time to look it over on Tuesday before they kick off hearings Wednesday morning, Cline complained. He predicts it will be "a short set of hearings."

Advertisement

Related:

ADAM SCHIFF

As for who the Judiciary Committee wants to hear from first, Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) suggested Schiff would be an ideal candidate.

"If he chooses not to, then I really question his veracity in what he's putting in his report," Collins said.

"It's easy to hide behind a report," Collins continued. But it's another thing "to have to answer questions" on what he knew about the whistleblower and the report.

At last month's Intel Committee hearings, Schiff claimed to not know the whistleblower's identity, which raised several eyebrows.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement