The Only Way We Lose This Is If We Choose to Lose
John Fetterman Keeps Making Sense. Here's What He Posted About Dems and Iran
Here's More Info on the Terror Attack at an Austin Bar
Rep. Celeste Maloy's FREE Act Looks to Drastically Improve Federal Permit Bureaucracy
Another Victim of the Rhode Island Trans Shooter Has Died
President Trump Held Medal of Honor Ceremony and Updated the Nation on Iran....
Salt Lake Tribune Runs Letter That Says Abortion Bans 'Lack Christian Charity'
Former Warren Campaign Worker Says the U.S. Must Be 'Abolished' to Atone for...
This Heartfelt Gesture From the Iranian Diaspora Shows Why President Trump Authorized Oper...
Anti-Gun RINO May Be Finally Going Down to Plucky YouTuber
Qatar Shoots Down Two Iranian Jets That Entered It's Airspace
The UN Responds to Iran Strikes With Its Favorite Weapon: A Strongly Worded...
Senator Adam Schiff Claims Iran Posed 'No Imminent Threat' to the United States
The Pentagon Says More Troops Are Being Deployed to Iran
Scott Jennings Explains Why Operation Epic Fury Isn't Another Forever War
Tipsheet

Florida Republican Rep Comes Out in Support of Assault Weapons Ban

Florida Republican Rep Comes Out in Support of Assault Weapons Ban

Florida Republican Rep. Brian Mast has penned an op-ed for the New York Times in which he comes out in support of an assault weapons ban. 

Mast starts his opinion piece by recalling the dozen years he spent in the Army. The war hero, who lost both of his legs in Afghanistan when a roadside bomb detonated below him, obviously always had a firearm on him. In civilian life, he is a lifelong member of the National Rifle Association and he conceal carries a pistol.

Advertisement

Mast uses this context to show he appreciates firearms and how they can serve to protect individuals. But, some firearms simply should not be accessible to civilians, he goes on to argue. One of the firearms he carried with him on the battlefield, he explained, was very similar to the AR-15-style semiautomatic weapon Nikolas Cruz used to kill 17 people in Parkland, FL last week. It should not be available for civilian purchase.

I have fired tens of thousands of rounds through that rifle, many in combat. We used it because it was the most lethal — the best for killing our enemies. And I know that my community, our schools and public gathering places are not made safer by any person having access to the best killing tool the Army could put in my hands. I cannot support the primary weapon I used to defend our people being used to kill children I swore to defend.

While "no" firearm is inherently evil, Mast says, "the rifle of choice for many mass shooters is the AR-15."

He added that he is also supportive of legislation that requires every gun purchaser to have a background check and raising the age limit for certain firearm purchases and ensuring that individuals with a history of mental illness cannot purchase firearms at all.

Advertisement

MSNBC anchor Joe Scarborough commended Mast for the "significant" op-ed.

Meanwhile, in a case of irony, a House Democrat, Rep. Dan Kildee of Michigan, has come out against a ban on semi-automatic weapons.

President Trump offered an alternative solution, saying we need to arm more teachers and security guards in schools.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement