Italy Executes Mass Arrests of Charity Workers Who Funneled Money to Jihadist Trash
CBS News Investigated Somali Daycare Centers After a YouTuber's Video Went Viral. Here's...
FBI Says It Thwarted a Planned ISIS-Style Terror Plot Ahead of New Year's...
Pseudo-Recessions
A Judge, a Technicality, and the Fight Over What We Feed Our Kids
Judicial Lessons From the Hannah Dugan Verdict
Wisconsin Gov. Evers Laments Healthcare Costs While Suing to Protect ‘Gender-Affirming’ Ca...
The Heckler Awards, Part 4 – The Continued Celebration of the Bottom of...
Did a Politico Writer Just Incite Violence Against Journalists Investigating Minnesota's F...
Peace Through Strength: US Military Surpasses Recruitment Goals Under Trump-Era Policies
Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud...
Mamdani to Be Inaugurated in Subway Station Built by Entrepreneurs and the Free...
Jessica Tarlov Shocked a 'Kid' Was Able to Expose $100 Million in Fraud...
Scott Jennings Goes Off on CNN Panelist Over Her Israel-Gaza Remarks, Comparing Israel...
Another Leftist Judge Is Blocking Trump's Deportations
Tipsheet

Watch: James Franco Confused By Professor's Pro-Abortion Logic

Actor James Franco appeared to be just as confused as the rest of us when he had to sit and listen to Princeton Professor Liz Harman's strange defense of abortion. He invited her on his "Philosophy Time" program, a new video series in which Franco discusses themes with Eliot Michaelson, a professor at The King's College London.

Advertisement

Michaelson, who teaches philosophy, was tasked with explaining her take on the morality of abortion. Here's the part that befuddled Franco.


"Among early fetuses, there are two very different kinds of beings," she claimed. "So, James, when you were an early fetus and Eliot, when you were an early fetus, all of us – I think that we already did have moral status then. But we had moral status in virtue of our futures – in virtue of the fact that we were the beginning stages of persons. But some early fetuses will die early in pregnancy, either due to abortion or miscarriage, and in my view that’s a very different kind of entity. That’s something that doesn’t have a future as a person and it doesn’t have moral status."

"So often we do know that if a woman is planning to get an abortion and we know that abortion is available to her, then we know that that fetus is gonna die," said Harmon. In such a case, "it’s not something with moral status on my view."

But, "if we know that a woman is planning to continue her pregnancy, then we have good reason to think that her fetus is something with moral status, something with this future as a person."

Advertisement

LifeSiteNews summed up Michaelson's argument as follows: "Some very young fetuses are worthy of rights and some of the same age aren't, based on whether they're wanted."

Franco was clearly confused by her "explanation" and questioned her logic.

"Why do you think that what’s actually gonna happen to a fetus in the future is gonna make this big difference between having some moral status and not?" asked Michaelson.

"Can't you only judge that in hindsight?" asked Franco.

In case I didn't mention already, Harman teaches at Princeton.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos