The Investigation Into Gavin Newsom Is Some Serious Karma
You'll Never Guess Why This Guy Burned a Cross in a Chicago Park
This Top SPLC Official Funneled Over $1 Million to Her Neo-Nazi Lover
Iranian Dissidents Make Passionate Appeal to President Trump
You'll Laugh Your Head Off When You Find Out How Trump Will Keep...
Disgraced Judge Hannah Dugan's Motion to Escape Justice Is Denied
Even Democrats Are Calling This Vegan-Backed Oregon Ballot Initiative 'Extreme'
Iran Will Be Allowed to Immediately Resume Selling Its Oil Under Latest Deal,...
The RNC Responds After 'Decoy' Dan Sullivan Is Removed From Alaska Ballot
We Have More Details on the UFC Freedom 250 Terror Plot
How a Calmer Border Is Helping Better Fight New World Screwworm
Gay Adoptive Fathers Found Guilty of Sexually Abusing, Murdering 13-Month-Old Baby Boy
Hillary Clinton Torches Biden Over 'Terrible Mistake' During 2024 Election
What Vance's Next Anti-Fraud Event Reveals About the Midterms
MLB Issues Warning to Giants Pitchers Over Bible Verses on 'Pride Night' Caps
Tipsheet

Watch: James Franco Confused By Professor's Pro-Abortion Logic

Watch: James Franco Confused By Professor's Pro-Abortion Logic

Actor James Franco appeared to be just as confused as the rest of us when he had to sit and listen to Princeton Professor Liz Harman's strange defense of abortion. He invited her on his "Philosophy Time" program, a new video series in which Franco discusses themes with Eliot Michaelson, a professor at The King's College London.

Advertisement

Michaelson, who teaches philosophy, was tasked with explaining her take on the morality of abortion. Here's the part that befuddled Franco.


"Among early fetuses, there are two very different kinds of beings," she claimed. "So, James, when you were an early fetus and Eliot, when you were an early fetus, all of us – I think that we already did have moral status then. But we had moral status in virtue of our futures – in virtue of the fact that we were the beginning stages of persons. But some early fetuses will die early in pregnancy, either due to abortion or miscarriage, and in my view that’s a very different kind of entity. That’s something that doesn’t have a future as a person and it doesn’t have moral status."

"So often we do know that if a woman is planning to get an abortion and we know that abortion is available to her, then we know that that fetus is gonna die," said Harmon. In such a case, "it’s not something with moral status on my view."

But, "if we know that a woman is planning to continue her pregnancy, then we have good reason to think that her fetus is something with moral status, something with this future as a person."

Advertisement

LifeSiteNews summed up Michaelson's argument as follows: "Some very young fetuses are worthy of rights and some of the same age aren't, based on whether they're wanted."

Franco was clearly confused by her "explanation" and questioned her logic.

"Why do you think that what’s actually gonna happen to a fetus in the future is gonna make this big difference between having some moral status and not?" asked Michaelson.

"Can't you only judge that in hindsight?" asked Franco.

In case I didn't mention already, Harman teaches at Princeton.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos