Italy Executes Mass Arrests of Charity Workers Who Funneled Money to Jihadist Trash
CBS News Investigated Somali Daycare Centers After a YouTuber's Video Went Viral. Here's...
FBI Says It Thwarted a Planned ISIS-Style Terror Plot Ahead of New Year's...
Pseudo-Recessions
Boys Shared Naked AI Images of a Female Student. The School Punished Her...
A Judge, a Technicality, and the Fight Over What We Feed Our Kids
Judicial Lessons From the Hannah Dugan Verdict
Wisconsin Gov. Evers Laments Healthcare Costs While Suing to Protect ‘Gender-Affirming’ Ca...
The Heckler Awards, Part 4 – The Continued Celebration of the Bottom of...
Did a Politico Writer Just Incite Violence Against Journalists Investigating Minnesota's F...
Peace Through Strength: US Military Surpasses Recruitment Goals Under Trump-Era Policies
Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud...
Mamdani to Be Inaugurated in Subway Station Built by Entrepreneurs and the Free...
Jessica Tarlov Shocked a 'Kid' Was Able to Expose $100 Million in Fraud...
Scott Jennings Goes Off on CNN Panelist Over Her Israel-Gaza Remarks, Comparing Israel...
Tipsheet

Holocaust Cited in Trial for Psychologists Who Developed 9/11 Interrogation Techniques

Military psychologists James Mitchell and John Bruce Jessen are two men who helped the CIA devise enhanced interrogation techniques for suspects detained after the September 11 terror attacks. Now, years later, the psychologists are in court facing lawsuits from two of those detainees who want them held accountable.

Advertisement

The psychologists “aided and abetted the torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment” their clients endured, according to the plaintiffs’ lawyers. 

A few of the EITs devised by Mitchell and Jessen include stuffing detainees into small boxes, slamming them against walls and waterboarding – all of which were legal on the detainee for whom they were devised, terror suspect Abu Zubaydah, The Buffalo News explains.

Interestingly, both the prosecution and the defense cited Holocaust trials in their arguments. The defense noted that technician at a poison gas company was acquitted of the crimes committed at Auschwitz because he could supposedly do nothing to stop the gas from ending up in the hands of the Nazis who were running the concentration camp. The prosecution countered that the owner of another gas company, Zyklon-B, was found guilty and hanged.

Waterboarding was banned in 2015 during the Obama administration on a bipartisan basis, with Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), who was tortured himself in Vietnam, leading the charge.

“We must continue to insist that the methods we employ in this fight for peace and freedom must always, always, be as right and honorable as the goals and ideals we fight for,” McCain said at the time.

Advertisement

Related:

HOLOCAUST

The Senate voted 78-21 to limit the U.S. government to use interrogation and detention techniques outlined in the Army Field Manual. 

Then-candidate Donald Trump said on the campaign trail last year that he would be open to bringing waterboarding back – and a whole lot worse.

Federal court Judge Justin L. Quackenbush insisted that this case will not become a political trial on whether the CIA’s response to 9/11 was proportionate to the crime. It would focus solely on whether the detainees were indeed subject to torture.

The case is expected to proceed to a trial in September, but the judge implored the sides to do everything in their power to avoid it. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos