Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Wednesday that the Justice Department will be increasing the use of civil asset forfeiture, especially in terms of drug trafficking, once more rolling back President Obama's agenda.
His announcement brought bipartisan criticism.
Opponents of civil asset forfeiture, which permits law enforcement officials to take money and goods from individuals suspected of crime, provide evidence to suggest that the process accounts for more theft than burglaries.
The legal process is often ripe with abuse, reports The Washington Post, particularly in regards to a practice known as "adoptive" forfeiture. Citing these concerns, the Justice Department under Obama sought to scale back the practice in 2015.
In 2015, Eric Holder's Justice Department issued a memo sharply curtailing a particular type of forfeiture practice that allowed local police to share part of their forfeiture proceeds with federal authorities. Known as “adoptive” forfeiture, it allowed state and local authorities to sidestep sometimes stricter state laws, processing forfeiture cases under the more permissive federal statute.
Republicans, too, are "troubled" by Sessions's directive.
Sessions, however, defended civil asset forfeiture as "appropriate," for "no criminal should be allowed to keep the proceeds of their crime."