So What If Targeting Jerome Powell Is Politically Motivated?
Wait, That's the Reasoning Behind Minnesota's Anti-ICE Lawsuit Against the Federal Governm...
Why Are So Many Leftists Such Trash?
Chevron Showdown: Supreme Court Weighs Energy Lawfare and Rogue Courts
In Reelection Launch, Josh Shapiro Admits Violent Attack Almost Drove Him From the...
Will Eric Swalwell Be Killed Off the Ballot?
It Depends on Where You Stand
Something Doesn’t Add Up
America’s Choice: A Civil Society or Dangerous Insurrection!
Are You Being Baited Into Rage?
Dignity for Thee—Not for Me
Kids’ Winter Cure for Nature Deficit Disorder
Regime Change in Venezuela: Key to Global Advance of Democracy and Peace
Trump Imposes 'Immediate' Tariffs on Iranian Trade Partners As Anti-Regime Protests Grow
Meta Taps Trump Ally for High Level Job
Tipsheet

Sessions Changes Obama Policy, Will Increase Civil Asset Forfeiture

Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Wednesday that the Justice Department will be increasing the use of civil asset forfeiture, especially in terms of drug trafficking, once more rolling back President Obama's agenda.

Advertisement

His announcement brought bipartisan criticism.

Opponents of civil asset forfeiture, which permits law enforcement officials to take money and goods from individuals suspected of crime, provide evidence to suggest that the process accounts for more theft than burglaries.

The legal process is often ripe with abuse, reports The Washington Post, particularly in regards to a practice known as "adoptive" forfeiture. Citing these concerns, the Justice Department under Obama sought to scale back the practice in 2015.

In 2015, Eric Holder's Justice Department issued a memo sharply curtailing a particular type of forfeiture practice that allowed local police to share part of their forfeiture proceeds with federal authorities. Known as “adoptive” forfeiture, it allowed state and local authorities to sidestep sometimes stricter state laws, processing forfeiture cases under the more permissive federal statute.

Advertisement

Related:

PRESIDENT OBAMA

Republicans, too, are "troubled" by Sessions's directive.

Sessions, however, defended civil asset forfeiture as "appropriate," for "no criminal should be allowed to keep the proceeds of their crime."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos