Let Your Rabid Leftist Friends And Family Go
Outgoing Biden Admin Exposed for Special Interest Corruption
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 243: What the New Testament Says About Fearing...
The Forever-Tarnished Legacy of Barack Obama
Avoiding Self-Inflicted Trade and Economic Wounds
Giving Thanks Is Good For You
The Hidden Pro-Life Message You Missed at Miss Universe
The Border's Broken Vetting System: Why We Can't Wait to Fix It
Can We Take Back the English Language Now?
Trump's Strategy On Iran Could End Middle East Wars
Trump Names His New Agriculture Secretary
Bombshell Report Reveals Disturbing Truths About the Biden-Harris Parole Pipeline
Gen. Milley Makes Stunning Admission About Incoming Trump Administration
ICE Sends Hochul Grim Warning After Arresting Wanted Illegal Immigrant
Sickening: An Illegal Alien Allegedly Raped a 14-Year-Old Girl in Colorado
Tipsheet

NYT Issues Correction for Revisiting Gabby Giffords Conspiracy

Social media users were incensed when The New York Times editors published an editorial Wednesday night in which they surmised what led to the shooting that morning at a congressional baseball practice. The gunman, 66-year-old James T. Hodgkinson, fired about 50 shots, sending five people to the hospital, including Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), who remains in critical condition. In their analysis, the Times editors suggest that political incitement had something to do with the attack, considering the assailant was a known Bernie Sanders supporter and a loud GOP critic.

Advertisement

In one passage, the editors revisit a debunked conspiracy theory regarding the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in 2011, suggesting that the shooting was inspired by a map published by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. 

It wasn’t. An FBI investigation, whose findings were revealed last year, found that Jared Lee Loughner was a disturbed young man who may very well have been obsessed with Giffords. His social media postings suggested he was undergoing a "mental breakdown," The Arizona Republic reported.

In conclusion, he was the sole author of the carnage.

The Times, finally recognizing their error, issued the following correction Thursday.

Happy to see the correction, but why was it there in the first place.

Advertisement

Nothing to say – except what Guy said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement