The Video Speaks for Itself, the ICE Agent Was Justified
Of Course, an ABC Analyst Smeared the ICE Agent Involved in the Shooting...
The Moral Blackmailing of the American People
Venezuela Freed From 'The Warmth of Collectivism'
Should Capitalism Have Any Guardrails?
Minnesota Democrats Are Testing How Woke Is Too Woke
The Uncontainable Embers of Iran’s Uprising
When Reality Triumphs Over Self-Destructive Kakistocracy
Tragedy and Reality
Iran's Theocracy Enters Its Last Days
The Supreme Court and the Coming Showdown on Men in Women's Sports
Schools Must Teach the History of Socialism
Should the US Intervene to Help Iranian Revolutionaries?
Hospitals Fight Trump to Protect a Cash Cow
Minneapolis Public Schools Reportedly Offering Remote Learning Through Feb. 12 After ICE S...
Tipsheet

NYT Issues Correction for Revisiting Gabby Giffords Conspiracy

Social media users were incensed when The New York Times editors published an editorial Wednesday night in which they surmised what led to the shooting that morning at a congressional baseball practice. The gunman, 66-year-old James T. Hodgkinson, fired about 50 shots, sending five people to the hospital, including Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), who remains in critical condition. In their analysis, the Times editors suggest that political incitement had something to do with the attack, considering the assailant was a known Bernie Sanders supporter and a loud GOP critic.

Advertisement

In one passage, the editors revisit a debunked conspiracy theory regarding the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in 2011, suggesting that the shooting was inspired by a map published by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. 

It wasn’t. An FBI investigation, whose findings were revealed last year, found that Jared Lee Loughner was a disturbed young man who may very well have been obsessed with Giffords. His social media postings suggested he was undergoing a "mental breakdown," The Arizona Republic reported.

In conclusion, he was the sole author of the carnage.

The Times, finally recognizing their error, issued the following correction Thursday.

Happy to see the correction, but why was it there in the first place.

Advertisement

Related:

NEW YORK TIMES

Nothing to say – except what Guy said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos