Sorry Dems, Affordability Is Trump's Strength
New Emails Reportedly Show Direct Biden White House Involvement in the Mar-a-Lago Raid
The Reason Why Dems Are Torpedoing Their 2024 Autopsy Is Beyond Abused
Last Night's Presser on the Brown University Shooter Took Many Wild Turns
How You Know the Lib Media Realizes There's Nothing in the Epstein Files...
The View Co-Host Drops Embarrassingly Shameful Take on Trump's Bonuses to Our Troops
What Trump Did to the Kennedy Center Triggered a Level-Five Lib Meltdown
Retirement Accounts Come Roaring Back in 2025
Trump Just Made a Move That Would Make JFK Proud
Can the Dark Ages Return?
Buyer's Remorse? Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich Blasts State for Healthcare Worker Abortion...
Another Jewish Massacre on a Jewish Holy Day Is a Wake-Up Call to...
Virginia’s Incoming Democratic Governor Doubles Down on Bias
It Will Be Okay
Jon Ossoff Is Just Another Elitist Liberal
Tipsheet

NYT Issues Correction for Revisiting Gabby Giffords Conspiracy

Social media users were incensed when The New York Times editors published an editorial Wednesday night in which they surmised what led to the shooting that morning at a congressional baseball practice. The gunman, 66-year-old James T. Hodgkinson, fired about 50 shots, sending five people to the hospital, including Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA), who remains in critical condition. In their analysis, the Times editors suggest that political incitement had something to do with the attack, considering the assailant was a known Bernie Sanders supporter and a loud GOP critic.

Advertisement

In one passage, the editors revisit a debunked conspiracy theory regarding the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) in 2011, suggesting that the shooting was inspired by a map published by former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. 

It wasn’t. An FBI investigation, whose findings were revealed last year, found that Jared Lee Loughner was a disturbed young man who may very well have been obsessed with Giffords. His social media postings suggested he was undergoing a "mental breakdown," The Arizona Republic reported.

In conclusion, he was the sole author of the carnage.

The Times, finally recognizing their error, issued the following correction Thursday.

Happy to see the correction, but why was it there in the first place.

Advertisement

Related:

NEW YORK TIMES

Nothing to say – except what Guy said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement