Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
Trump Won’t Say It Out Loud but His Team Thinks They Know Who...
You'll Never Guess How the Authorities Found and Killed Cartel Leader El Mencho
OpenAI Flagged Canada Mass Shooter for Violent Content, but Didn't Contact the Authorities
The Atlantic Thinks Republicans Have a 'Nazi Problem'
Guess What David Hogg Blamed for Mexican Cartel Gun Violence
Gavin Newsom Continues to Lie About His Privileged Childhood
Proof that Anti-Gun Group Cares About Control, Not Safety
Social Media Erupts After HuffPost Questions National Pride at the Winter Olympics
Here's How the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling Exposes Liberal Justices Desire to Expand...
The Violence in Mexico Vindicates Trump’s Push to Treat Drug Cartels As Terrorists...
Gavin Newsom Doubles Down on His Racist Comments: It's 'Fake F**king Outrage'
Trump Predicts the Supreme Court Could Rule Against His Birthright Citizenship Case After...
The Women's Hockey Team Snubbed Trump's SOTU Invite
Limited Government, Lasting Opportunity
Tipsheet

House May Ease School Lunch Standards

House May Ease School Lunch Standards

The House of Representatives is set to vote Thursday on a Department of Agriculture spending bill that contains a provision to allow schools to opt out of the Obama administration's healthy school lunch standards.

Advertisement

The vote is expected around 6 p.m. and follows a Senate Agriculture Committee hearing on child nutrition. The hearing included testimony from retired Air Force general Richard E. Hawley on the impact that child nutrition has on the military. Hawley argued that rising childhood obesity causes fewer young adults to be able to serve in the military.

The administration's rules require schools to add more fruits and green vegetables to breakfasts and lunches as well as to reduce the amount of salt and fat in their meal options. They were a part of Michelle Obama's "Let's Move!" campaign to fight childhood obesity through healthy eating and exercise.

Obama has been actively defending the lunch standards. She railed Republicans for attempting to roll back the standards at a White House meeting with school leaders and experts at the end of May. She also had a New York Times op-ed in which she said, "Our children deserve so much better than this."

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) acknowledged that the healthy lunch standards create an additional cost for schools. However, she argued that treating conditions like Type 2 diabetes and hypertension in overweight children cost even more, about $14 billion a year.

Advertisement

"I have been very clear that we want to move forward," Stabenow said."We're not going to roll back what we're doing."

Stabenow should realize that whether or not medical treatment is more expensive, the schools aren't responsible for footing those healthcare costs. They are, however, responsible for paying for this mandatory policy that many children don't even want to utilize. While the cause is admirable, making such regulations mandatory will not work for every school. Obama needs to realize that a better strategy would be to work on this issue in other non-compulsory ways, rather than to maintain this required regulation that forces schools to play parent even when the policy clearly isn't working.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement