Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Jihad Joe
Biden Administration: 'Reasonable to Assess' That Israel Broke International Law With Gaza...
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
California Surf Competition Will Be Required to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
Tipsheet

Your Tax Dollars at Work: IRS Travel Edition

A new Inspector General report for the IRS finds that some employees have racked up impressive (shall we say) expenses for traveling to and from Washington, D.C.
Advertisement

Here are some of the figures for the "travel" days for the executives in 2011 and the associated expenses:

Executive A - 290 days - $88,951

Executive B - 238 days - $115,806

Executive C - 213 days - $105,127

Executive D - 172 days - $135,333

Executive E - 179 days - $47,322

Executive G - 193 days - $86,433

Executive K - 174 days - $64,521

Executive L - 173 days - $62,233

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that some of these folks are actually commuting to work in the nation's capital, and charging us for it.
Jamie Dupree of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, who broke the story, notes that the report on executive travel found "no evidence of wrongdoing."  Au contraire - I would argue that, although nothing in the report itself alleges illegality or any breach of IRS regulations, that fact is a scandal in itself.  Like so much in DC, the outrage here isn't what's illegal, it's what's permitted.
Were these people so uniquely valuable to the agency that we needed to subsidize these travel costs in order to have the benefit of their services? Were there special situations that legitimately prevented them from relocating to the place where they work? Or were federal government employees once again providing an example of the Beltway's reflexive contempt for the taxpayers who subsidize their oh-so-privileged lifestyles?
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement