Bill Maher Offers a Simple Explanation for Why He Trashes the Left More...
Trump Continues to Increase His Lead Over Harris in Latest Electoral College Projection
Did You Miss This Damning Article About Kamala Harris on Axios?
Trump Spills What He'll Never Do Again If Elected Again
Teacher Who Refused to Refer to Students by 'Preferred Pronouns' Jailed for the...
Trump Announces a Role for Dr. Ben Carson In His Administration
Longtime Democrat Alan Dershowitz Leaves His Party: 'Absolutely Disgusted'
Tim Walz Won't Like This Attraction That Drew Crowds at His Own State...
Antisemitism From the Right
Kamala’s Uncontrolled Price Control Hypocrisy
New Jersey Is the Latest Victim of High Electricity Prices
Iran + Nukes = Armageddon
A Tale of Two States: Conservatism of Gov. Reynolds vs. Socialism of Gov....
Not Just Israel: The Orthodox Jewish Community’s Support for Trump and the GOP
Why Daniel Craig Won’t Answer Questions About a Gay James Bond
Tipsheet

Your Tax Dollars at Work: IRS Travel Edition

A new Inspector General report for the IRS finds that some employees have racked up impressive (shall we say) expenses for traveling to and from Washington, D.C.
Advertisement

Here are some of the figures for the "travel" days for the executives in 2011 and the associated expenses:

Executive A - 290 days - $88,951

Executive B - 238 days - $115,806

Executive C - 213 days - $105,127

Executive D - 172 days - $135,333

Executive E - 179 days - $47,322

Executive G - 193 days - $86,433

Executive K - 174 days - $64,521

Executive L - 173 days - $62,233

It doesn't take a brain surgeon to figure out that some of these folks are actually commuting to work in the nation's capital, and charging us for it.
Jamie Dupree of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, who broke the story, notes that the report on executive travel found "no evidence of wrongdoing."  Au contraire - I would argue that, although nothing in the report itself alleges illegality or any breach of IRS regulations, that fact is a scandal in itself.  Like so much in DC, the outrage here isn't what's illegal, it's what's permitted.
Were these people so uniquely valuable to the agency that we needed to subsidize these travel costs in order to have the benefit of their services? Were there special situations that legitimately prevented them from relocating to the place where they work? Or were federal government employees once again providing an example of the Beltway's reflexive contempt for the taxpayers who subsidize their oh-so-privileged lifestyles?
Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement