Pro-Hamas Supporters at LSU Didn't Know What to Do When the Fraternities Showed...
Who Thought It Was a Good Idea to Bring Out 'The Lost Jedi'?
The Left’s New School Choice Playbook in Arkansas Serves as a National Warning
Supporters of President Trump Should Not Support Biden’s DOJ or its Dark Antitrust...
The Truth About the CIA
The Left’s Radicalization Of Our Children
Holly Rehder: The Only MAGA Candidate in the Race for Missouri Lt. Governor
RFK, Jr.'s Proposed 'No Spoiler Pledge' Is a Stroke of Genius
It's Time to Use American Energy As a Weapon
Why Intellectuals Don't Like Capitalism
NYPD Reveals Details About the 'Professional' Pro-Hamas Agitators Popping Up on Campuses
Liberal Reporter Triggered by Frat Boys Counterprotesting Hamas Agitators, Calls Them 'Rac...
Columbia President Breaks Overdue Silence Amid Pro-Hamas Protests
Illegal Immigrants Ambush Michigan State Capitol to Demand Driver Licenses
Trump Narrows His VP List Down to These Four Potential Candidates
Tipsheet

Giving Romney a Chance

As noted elsewhere on the blog, Mitt Romney launched his presidential campaign bid today, to a barrage of criticism from Sarah Palin, Rudy Giuliani and others.
Advertisement

Giuliani's criticism doesn't surprise me; you'll recall that there was no love lost between him and Romney back in 2008 (nor does one get the feeling that the former mayor is the type simply to forget those kinds of things).  And Sarah Palin was, as Guy notes below, directly asked about Romneycare.

But what is surprising to me is the effort, in some necks of the conservative woods, to strangle the Romney campaign baby in the cradle.  Why the seeming attempts to shut down a Romney run preemptively?

Yes, we all know that he's shifted some positions over the years (so has any politician whose been in public life for more than ten years -- and so have those who supported him in 2008 but are disparaging him now).  Yes, Romneycare included the hated individual mandate (albeit on a state, not national, basis).  Unfortunate, yes.  Sub-optimal, yes.  But come on.

On the other hand, Romney has loads of executive experience.  He's survived the exigencies of a presidential campaign before.  He can raise money.  And he understands the economy and how to create jobs -- and, given his background, will be perceived as such by "normal" voters who are less concerned with conservative "purity."  The Democrats get that, and they fear it.)
Advertisement

Those are not small assets.  Maybe a better candidate will emerge.  But others, who attract a more passionate following, have some troubles of their own (including those who, like Herman Cain, I kind of like).

So let's not start trying to run credible, mainstream candidates out of the race prematurely (except for any who join President Obama in dumping on the GOP's current legislative platform).  Let's let a thousand flowers bloom.  

Yes, let's find the most conservative candidate.  But equally important, let's also make sure he or she is the most conservative candidate who can actually defeat President Obama.  Times are too serious -- and the country's straits are too dire -- to allow President Obama to win reelection simply because Republicans weren't smart in choosing a candidate to oppose him.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement