North Carolina's State Treasurer Calls on BlackRock CEO Larry Fink to Resign
And a Player to Be Named Later...
DeSantis Tops Trump in 2024 Primary Race Poll
Why Sinema's Defection Just Made 2024 More Interesting
Biden's Non-Binary Nuke Official Busted Again for Stealing Luggage at Another Airport
Let’s Talk About Thom Tillis
Biden's Deal for the Devil
Analysis: With 2022 Midterms in Rearview Mirror, Hard and Clear Lessons Emerge for...
Veteran Congressman Reveals Shocking Place One Democrat Stored Her American Flag
Inflation Surges Past Expectations Again
Top Democrat Criticizes Biden's 'Deeply Disturbing' Prisoner Swap Decision
Why Oregon Teachers' Union Has Lost 20 Percent of Its Membership
One State Lowers Teaching Qualifications to Address Teacher Shortages
Critics Notice Something Unusual in Video of Prisoner Exchange That Freed Griner
Kyrsten Sinema Has Left the Democratic Party

"Tolerance" Is a Two-Way Street

The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz writes on the insufferable "liberal piety" of those who support erecting a mosque on Ground Zero as a symbol of America's religious tolerance.

It's a specious argument, to be sure.  How is it "intolerant" to ask that a towering symbol of Islam be moved a few blocks from the place where 3000 murders were committed in the name of radical Islam?  And, to use a favored left-wing word, isn't it, in fact, quite "insensitive" of the mosque's supporters to insist on precisely this location?

To use another First Amendment analogy, no one is trying to "censor" the practice of Islam.  Rather, given the unique damage inflicted on the U.S. by the 9/11 attacks, many Americans are just asking for the analogue to a "time/place/manner restriction": Not at  this time (less than a decade after 9/11), in this place (the shadow of Ground Zero) and in this manner (if the mosque's supporters really wanted to symbolize interfaith unity, as they claim, why not make the building an interfaith chapel?).

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video