Katie Hobbs’ Office Threatened County Board With Arrest If They Didn’t Certify Results
House Republicans Vote Against Banning Earmarks: 'Shameful Display of Swamp Politics'
Requiem for a Pundit: Here Is a Best-Of List as a Farewell to...
'Should Never Have Come to This': Congress Passes Bill to Avert Rail Strike
New Poll Shows Walker, Warnock Tied in Georgia Senate Runoff Election
CNN Falls for Comedian Who Trolls GOP Rallies as a Real Herschel Walker...
Here's What Happened to an Iranian Man Who Celebrated the National Team's World...
Former Rolling Stone Reporter Highlights One Story That's Crazier Than the 2020 Election
Sam Bankman-Fried in NYT Interview: 'I've Had a Bad Month'
Biden Administration Keeps Screwing Up Narrative on COVID Vaccine
Jim Jordan Plans to Haul Clapper and Brennan in for Testimony
Chris Cillizza Caught Up in CNN Layoffs
Students in Ohio District Avoid Using the School Bathroom Due to Transgender Policies,...
San Francisco Police Have a New Method to Neutralize Violent Criminals
This Florida Move Is the Largest Anti-ESG Divestment in History

So It's Kagan

If elections have consequences -- and conservatives believe they do and should -- then President Obama is well within his rights to choose Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court. 

In fact, from a conservative's perspective, the choice could have been much, much worse.  Judging from conservatives who are now professors at Harvard Law School, Kagan did a great and "apolitical" job in a role where left-wing grandstanding goes completely unpunished.  Unlike many in her milieu (and, I would suspect, colleagues like Sonia Sotomayor) she has treated conservative ideas with genuine intellectual respect and fair-mindedness.

On the Court, I would suspect that she will be a reliable (though not necessarily predictable) liberal vote (it seems that no one ever "grows" to the right after ascending to the Court) -- but then again, what do conservatives expect when a lefty like Obama is doing the nominating?

Her lack of a paper trail offers few clues about how she'll ultimately turn out, which of course makes the left nervous and complicates any effort on the right to oppose her.  Indeed, let's hope those of us on the right use this occasion -- not to engage in gratuitous and ugly attacks on Kagan personally -- but rather to promote our view of why it matters that judges stick to their constitutional role of adjudicating, rather than legislating from the bench.

The fact is that Kagan is too savvy to have a "wise Latina" moment -- a remark that conservatives can use to showcase the objectionable biases in a potential Supreme Court justice.  During the hearings (and with Court nominees, except in rare cases like Sotomayor, it's impossible to predict exactly what will happen afterwards) Kagan will seem reasonable, moderate, smart and good-humored.  Her obvious intelligence and affability and likelihood to say nothing of import will put her opponents on the defensive -- and create the risk that attacks on her will seem mean-spirited and substance-free.

Again, perhaps that creates an opportunity for Republicans -- not to block Kagan (and then, in all likelihood, end up with a nominee that's no further right) -- but rather to continue to explain to the American people why our vision of jurisprudence is superior to the left-wing, "living Constitution" brand that would effectively transform justices into oligarchs, able to read their own political preferences into America's founding documents.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video