Why the Judge in Hunter Biden's Tax Case Thinks Parts of the Pardon...
CNN's Elie Honig Had the Perfect Line for Hunter Biden's Pardon
Why Are Deep Red State Republican Senators So Often Squishes?
Stone Age Ports
Crash Retrievals, Reverse Engineering, and the Cost of Secrecy: The UAP Debate Unfolds.
Democratic Anger About Biden Pardon Is All About Trump
More Biden Abuse of Power
Drug Price Controls Threaten Cancer Cures
Republicans Still Don't Get It
The Looming Resistance to Donald Trump’s Immigration Agenda
Jill Biden’s Christmas Circus: A Confusing End to a Crummy Four Years
Chris Wright’s Appointment as Secretary of Energy Exposes Media Ignorance
The Fall of DEI: How President Trump Ushers in a Merit-Based Future
American Patients Were Big Winners on Election Night
Nationwide Injunction against Deep State FinCEN
Tipsheet

Pro-Life, Or Not?

The fact that the Hill has the whip count at 39 "no" Democrat votes means that, without Stupak, health care "reform" will fail.

If these reports are accurate, Nancy Pelosi is working frantically to convince a critical mass of self-proclaimed pro-life Democrats to agree that an Executive Order with pro-life language is sufficient to protect the unborn.
Advertisement


The fact that such an agreement is even being floated makes it clear that, for the first time in history, ObamaCare would provide for federal funding for abortion.  And an Executive Order provides no meaningful protection for the unborn, as -- unlike a guarantee enshrined in actual legislation -- it can simply be revoked at any time.  This is true regardless of how "good" the language sounds.  As the Conference of Catholic Bishops has made clear, you simply can't be pro-life and vote for this "compromise."

Ultimately, the question for the Stupak bloc is this: Are you really pro-life, or not?  Let's pray these congressmen remain firm in their resolve to stand up for the unborn  babies.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement