Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
Tipsheet

Pro-Life, Or Not?

The fact that the Hill has the whip count at 39 "no" Democrat votes means that, without Stupak, health care "reform" will fail.

If these reports are accurate, Nancy Pelosi is working frantically to convince a critical mass of self-proclaimed pro-life Democrats to agree that an Executive Order with pro-life language is sufficient to protect the unborn.
Advertisement


The fact that such an agreement is even being floated makes it clear that, for the first time in history, ObamaCare would provide for federal funding for abortion.  And an Executive Order provides no meaningful protection for the unborn, as -- unlike a guarantee enshrined in actual legislation -- it can simply be revoked at any time.  This is true regardless of how "good" the language sounds.  As the Conference of Catholic Bishops has made clear, you simply can't be pro-life and vote for this "compromise."

Ultimately, the question for the Stupak bloc is this: Are you really pro-life, or not?  Let's pray these congressmen remain firm in their resolve to stand up for the unborn  babies.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement