Good Riddance to the Awful Thomas Massie
A Hollywood Director Claims 'No Group Is Worse’ Than These People
The Freak Out Over Demi Moore Being in Shape Is Stupid
Steak ’n Shake Is Serving up MAHA
Let's Not Forget About Left-Wing Violence
AOC, Ice Cream, and Veggies
Feeding the Government Pig
Victims Everywhere
Gavin Newsom Has a Kamala Harris Problem
What Regular Folks Want — and Why the Left Keeps Getting It Wrong
Why the Nevada State Treasurer Race Matters
Sanders Invites China’s AI Czars to Washington—and Waves the Flag of AI Surrender
James Blair's Victory
China Is Not Merely a Competitor — It Is Fueling America's Enemies
IRS Handouts to Noncitizens: Your Tax Dollars Funding the Wrong Team
Tipsheet

"Through the Mud"?

"Through the  Mud"?
Refusing to answer legitimate questions about which government lawyers now at the DOJ once represented inmates at Guantanamo Bay, a Justice spokesman characterizes the inquiries as an attempt to "drag people's names through the mud."
Advertisement


Interesting.  If those lawyers -- and the Justice Department -- aren't ashamed of their service, why won't they name them?  What makes revealing one's clients tantamount to a trip "through the mud" (unless the clients themselves are, to hold the metaphor, pigs)?

I take from all this that the Obama Justice Department -- and the left -- is setting a precedent, so that if future Republican departments care to hire lawyers who have previously represented everything from pro-lifers to homeschoolers to pro-religion groups, they need not disclose their names or their previous associations.

Oh, wait -- that's different.  And that's because, for much of the left, some of these folks are actually deemed more dangerous than terrorists. Just ask Janet Napolitano.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement